This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
HabsburgâOttoman wars in Hungary (1526â1568) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books ¡ news ¡ scholar ¡ free images ¡ WP refs) ¡ FENS ¡ JSTOR ¡ TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"thanks to brave leadership by Captain Nikola JuriĹĄiÄ the city fought off every assault. As a result, the city was offered terms; the garrison was spared in return for the surrender of the city."
This quotation is just one of many, many legends and lies.
Haha, it seems like all leaders against the Ottomans are gods and heroes! They are Humans, all commanders cannot be so brave! I am very tired of reading articles with European benefit Only! Nobody writes for Turkish benefit. The Whole wikipedia is Anti-Turkish, almost nothing is correct when talking about battle against Turks. Everyone transforms legends into real history. All articles considering the Ottomans, and all other Turkish related articles should be deleted from wikipedia, it is just a bunch of legends, unreliable sources and Anti-Turkish comments.
Stephen, Turnbull (2003). The Ottoman Empire 1326 - 1699. New York: Osprey. pp. p.
hmm as i know this war the ottoman won because they defeat the armies of ferdindan in hungary the ottoman won important battles and then the habsburg kaiser had to pay every year a tribute to the sultan all historians say this for example Die TĂźrkenkriege from Klaus-Peter-Matschke so i would propose that the result was not indeccisive but ottoman victory because main reason is that the habsburg kaiser had to have pay every year a tribute and lost important battles also historians say that this first war beetween ottoman and habsburg the ottoman won Die TĂźrkenkriege Klaus-Peter-Matschke or TĂźrkenbeute srry for my bad englisch i´m from germany âPreceding unsigned comment added by 85.181.43.77 ( talk) 15:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
There are two different pages about the same military conflict (the second is Austro-Turkish War (1526â1552)). It seems to me that it could be reasonable to merge new page with more old. -- Slb nsk ( talk) 15:49, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:Hungary 1550.png, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:35, 29 September 2011 (UTC) |
This article seems to erroneously identify the kleinkrieg with a single conflict limited to 1530-1552. In fact kleinkrieg refers to the type of low-intensity warfare which took place during peacetime between the Ottomans and Habsburgs during the whole period of Ottoman rule in Hungary, but particularly 1568-1683. This article totally misses the point and mischaracterizes its topic. It describes Ottoman military campaigns in Hungary - but if there's an imperial army involved, then it's not a kleinkrieg. The war is not "little" when the sultan is marching into Hungary at the head of an army. Kleinkrieg refers to, say, an Ottoman or Habsburg district governor leading a couple thousand men on a raid against the other side, not Suleiman the Magnificent attacking Habsburg fortresses with tens of thousands of men. Chamboz ( talk) 23:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
The infobox includes the Papal States as a combatant on the Habsburg side. However, there is no mention in the article that the Pope sent troops to fight in the war. Is there any proof that Papal soldiers fought in Hungary during this time, or should I remove the Papal States from the infobox? King Philip V of Spain ( talk) 14:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
HabsburgâOttoman wars in Hungary (1526â1568) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books ¡ news ¡ scholar ¡ free images ¡ WP refs) ¡ FENS ¡ JSTOR ¡ TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"thanks to brave leadership by Captain Nikola JuriĹĄiÄ the city fought off every assault. As a result, the city was offered terms; the garrison was spared in return for the surrender of the city."
This quotation is just one of many, many legends and lies.
Haha, it seems like all leaders against the Ottomans are gods and heroes! They are Humans, all commanders cannot be so brave! I am very tired of reading articles with European benefit Only! Nobody writes for Turkish benefit. The Whole wikipedia is Anti-Turkish, almost nothing is correct when talking about battle against Turks. Everyone transforms legends into real history. All articles considering the Ottomans, and all other Turkish related articles should be deleted from wikipedia, it is just a bunch of legends, unreliable sources and Anti-Turkish comments.
Stephen, Turnbull (2003). The Ottoman Empire 1326 - 1699. New York: Osprey. pp. p.
hmm as i know this war the ottoman won because they defeat the armies of ferdindan in hungary the ottoman won important battles and then the habsburg kaiser had to pay every year a tribute to the sultan all historians say this for example Die TĂźrkenkriege from Klaus-Peter-Matschke so i would propose that the result was not indeccisive but ottoman victory because main reason is that the habsburg kaiser had to have pay every year a tribute and lost important battles also historians say that this first war beetween ottoman and habsburg the ottoman won Die TĂźrkenkriege Klaus-Peter-Matschke or TĂźrkenbeute srry for my bad englisch i´m from germany âPreceding unsigned comment added by 85.181.43.77 ( talk) 15:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
There are two different pages about the same military conflict (the second is Austro-Turkish War (1526â1552)). It seems to me that it could be reasonable to merge new page with more old. -- Slb nsk ( talk) 15:49, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:Hungary 1550.png, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:35, 29 September 2011 (UTC) |
This article seems to erroneously identify the kleinkrieg with a single conflict limited to 1530-1552. In fact kleinkrieg refers to the type of low-intensity warfare which took place during peacetime between the Ottomans and Habsburgs during the whole period of Ottoman rule in Hungary, but particularly 1568-1683. This article totally misses the point and mischaracterizes its topic. It describes Ottoman military campaigns in Hungary - but if there's an imperial army involved, then it's not a kleinkrieg. The war is not "little" when the sultan is marching into Hungary at the head of an army. Kleinkrieg refers to, say, an Ottoman or Habsburg district governor leading a couple thousand men on a raid against the other side, not Suleiman the Magnificent attacking Habsburg fortresses with tens of thousands of men. Chamboz ( talk) 23:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
The infobox includes the Papal States as a combatant on the Habsburg side. However, there is no mention in the article that the Pope sent troops to fight in the war. Is there any proof that Papal soldiers fought in Hungary during this time, or should I remove the Papal States from the infobox? King Philip V of Spain ( talk) 14:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC)