This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Haakon VII article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on 10 dates. show |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | On 9 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Haakon VII. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | On 3 November 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Haakon VII of Norway to Haakon VII. The result of the discussion was moved. |
The result of the move request was: no consensus. The arguments bring up good points: usual WP:SOVEREIGN criteria may apply (per the opposers), but that criteria's own exception may also apply if the Norweigan monarchy "use[s] a completely different namestock,...need not follow this convention; there is no disambiguation to pre-empt." I'm closing instead of relisting because as Dr. Vogel mentioned, this affects many articles (such as Haakon's successors) and needs broader discussion—at the relevant WikiProjects or as a multi-move request. ( non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 ( talk · contribs) 15:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Haakon VII of Norway → Haakon VII – further disambiguation isn't need PK2 ( talk) 05:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC) This is a contested technical request ( permalink). Dr. Vogel ( talk) 13:07, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. Each side makes a valid point; but as usual, policy based arguments should always triumph. Best, ( closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans ( talk) 12:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
– Per WP:NCROY, WP:COMMONNAME, WP:PRECISE, and WP:CONCISE. All of these monarchs were the only monarchs by their name & numeral (thus no issues with precision). Concision needs no explanation. And as NCROY has been recently updated by community consensus to support this format. estar8806 ( talk) ★ 20:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
(non-automated message) Greetings! I have opened an RfC on WT:ROYALTY that may be of interest to users following this article talk page! You are encouraged to contribute to this discussion here! Hurricane Andrew ( 444) 19:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Haakon VII article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on 10 dates. show |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | On 9 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Haakon VII. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | On 3 November 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Haakon VII of Norway to Haakon VII. The result of the discussion was moved. |
The result of the move request was: no consensus. The arguments bring up good points: usual WP:SOVEREIGN criteria may apply (per the opposers), but that criteria's own exception may also apply if the Norweigan monarchy "use[s] a completely different namestock,...need not follow this convention; there is no disambiguation to pre-empt." I'm closing instead of relisting because as Dr. Vogel mentioned, this affects many articles (such as Haakon's successors) and needs broader discussion—at the relevant WikiProjects or as a multi-move request. ( non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 ( talk · contribs) 15:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Haakon VII of Norway → Haakon VII – further disambiguation isn't need PK2 ( talk) 05:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC) This is a contested technical request ( permalink). Dr. Vogel ( talk) 13:07, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. Each side makes a valid point; but as usual, policy based arguments should always triumph. Best, ( closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans ( talk) 12:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
– Per WP:NCROY, WP:COMMONNAME, WP:PRECISE, and WP:CONCISE. All of these monarchs were the only monarchs by their name & numeral (thus no issues with precision). Concision needs no explanation. And as NCROY has been recently updated by community consensus to support this format. estar8806 ( talk) ★ 20:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
(non-automated message) Greetings! I have opened an RfC on WT:ROYALTY that may be of interest to users following this article talk page! You are encouraged to contribute to this discussion here! Hurricane Andrew ( 444) 19:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)