![]() | HMS Hercules (1910) has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 9, 2017. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
HMS Hercules (1910) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Added some historical detail Fenton Robb 10:58, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
I think this page should be formatted in the RN template. I am too new to take this on yet, but if someone else did, I could have a go at filling in some more details. Fenton Robb 13:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
At High Seas Fleet the count of German ships is reported as 11 battleships, 5 battlecruisers, 8 cruisers and 48t destroyers, however the numbers in Beatty's orders of 20th are 9 battleships, 5 battle cruiser, 7 light cruisers and 50 destroyers ( Memorandum H.F. 0050/9, issued on 20 November 1918, by Admiral Sir David Beatty)] Hearsay evidence - two German destroyers failed to leave port.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 ( talk · contribs) 06:27, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
This article is in pretty good shape.
That's me done. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 07:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
"One of her high-explosive (HE) shells penetrated through the upper superstructure and caused minor splinter damage. The second HE shell burst on hitting the upper hull armour,.." ? She would have been firing armour-piercing, not HE at naval targets ? Rcbutcher ( talk) 06:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() | HMS Hercules (1910) has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 9, 2017. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
HMS Hercules (1910) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Added some historical detail Fenton Robb 10:58, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
I think this page should be formatted in the RN template. I am too new to take this on yet, but if someone else did, I could have a go at filling in some more details. Fenton Robb 13:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
At High Seas Fleet the count of German ships is reported as 11 battleships, 5 battlecruisers, 8 cruisers and 48t destroyers, however the numbers in Beatty's orders of 20th are 9 battleships, 5 battle cruiser, 7 light cruisers and 50 destroyers ( Memorandum H.F. 0050/9, issued on 20 November 1918, by Admiral Sir David Beatty)] Hearsay evidence - two German destroyers failed to leave port.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 ( talk · contribs) 06:27, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
This article is in pretty good shape.
That's me done. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 07:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
"One of her high-explosive (HE) shells penetrated through the upper superstructure and caused minor splinter damage. The second HE shell burst on hitting the upper hull armour,.." ? She would have been firing armour-piercing, not HE at naval targets ? Rcbutcher ( talk) 06:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)