Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Eurocopter ( talk) 15:00, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Although a short article, I believe it qualifies for GA at the moment. Some improvements before ACR/FA is recomended to be made especially in the referencing sector (duplicate notes in long paragraphs, add some references in the infobox). Keep up the good work! -- Eurocopter ( talk) 15:00, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Eurocopter ( talk) 15:00, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Although a short article, I believe it qualifies for GA at the moment. Some improvements before ACR/FA is recomended to be made especially in the referencing sector (duplicate notes in long paragraphs, add some references in the infobox). Keep up the good work! -- Eurocopter ( talk) 15:00, 29 November 2009 (UTC)