HMS Basilisk (1910) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 24, 2024. ( Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force British military history task force European military history task force World War I task force Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles United Kingdom This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Basilisk (1910)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Simongraham ( talk · contribs) 04:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs) 17:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC) reply

I'll get to this shortly.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 17:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Earwig 1.0%
• Image appropriately licensed
• Name of turbine manufacturer not necessary in the infobox
  • Removed.
• Link Portsmouth in the lede, knot, yard number, commissioned, German Navy
  • Added.
• Were the torpedo tubes fixed or rotating?
  • Clarified with reference.
• Tell the reader what kind of ships Goeben and Breslau were
  • Added
• Tell the reader that Bouvet was a French ship
  • Added.
• Wemyss wasn't ennobled until after the war
  • Removed.
• Bombarding, not bombing
  • Changed
• One overlink
  • Removed duplink to Dardanelles.

@ Sturmvogel 66: Thank you for this review. Sorry for the delay - I had not realised you were finished. I believe the edits are done. Please tell me if there is anything more. simongraham ( talk) 02:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC) reply