This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Grumpy Old Man article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Grumpy Old Man was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't this be listed as an episode (Or Family Guy episode)? I was directed here from Victor Meldrew, which describes the grumpy old man archetype. Magicwalltree ( talk) 21:28, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Koopatrev ( talk · contribs) 14:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
I will review this article soon (before June 4, 2012). Koopatrev ( talk) 14:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Reviewing now. Koopatrev ( talk) 08:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Nothing wrong so far. Done
I'm going to put this on hold until these problems are solved.
This article is going to fail if no changes/improvements are to be made by June 9, 2012, 08:48 (UTC). Koopatrev ( talk) 06:36, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
1. It is well written.
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable;.:
3. It is broad in coverage:
The section for reviews from critics in the "reception" section is still missing. However there is still a part for U.S. viewers and ratings.
4. It is written in a neutral point of view.:
5. Reasonably stable?
6. Includes images, where appropriate.:
Overall:
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Grumpy Old Man. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Grumpy Old Man article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Grumpy Old Man was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't this be listed as an episode (Or Family Guy episode)? I was directed here from Victor Meldrew, which describes the grumpy old man archetype. Magicwalltree ( talk) 21:28, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Koopatrev ( talk · contribs) 14:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
I will review this article soon (before June 4, 2012). Koopatrev ( talk) 14:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Reviewing now. Koopatrev ( talk) 08:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Nothing wrong so far. Done
I'm going to put this on hold until these problems are solved.
This article is going to fail if no changes/improvements are to be made by June 9, 2012, 08:48 (UTC). Koopatrev ( talk) 06:36, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
1. It is well written.
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable;.:
3. It is broad in coverage:
The section for reviews from critics in the "reception" section is still missing. However there is still a part for U.S. viewers and ratings.
4. It is written in a neutral point of view.:
5. Reasonably stable?
6. Includes images, where appropriate.:
Overall:
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Grumpy Old Man. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)