From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello guys:

I thought I might post an edit which gives more of the international nature of the group. I think that my edit does represent this - but please let me know if you don't think my edit is fair. I'm also wondering whether country-specific research ought to be reported at this stage. I thought I might raise this as a discussion question before making any edits on this.

Kind regards, Jim Page (Australia)

....................................................................................................................

Colleagues:

I've been re-reading the article, and I am concerned that the "research" section, which purportedly gives preliminary findings, is actually providing original research, which is counter one of the core prinicples of wikipedia, namely, no original research.

I am thinking of deleting this. By way of replacement, I propose providing greater detail on the contributors to the project. Any objections?

Regards, Jim Page (Australia) April 5, 2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamessmithpage ( talkcontribs) 10:35, 6 April 2009 (UTC) reply

/* GIGAP Membership */ table

I wikitabled the membership as it was difficult to read in in-line format. -- ProfPolySci45 ( talk) 06:51, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello guys:

I thought I might post an edit which gives more of the international nature of the group. I think that my edit does represent this - but please let me know if you don't think my edit is fair. I'm also wondering whether country-specific research ought to be reported at this stage. I thought I might raise this as a discussion question before making any edits on this.

Kind regards, Jim Page (Australia)

....................................................................................................................

Colleagues:

I've been re-reading the article, and I am concerned that the "research" section, which purportedly gives preliminary findings, is actually providing original research, which is counter one of the core prinicples of wikipedia, namely, no original research.

I am thinking of deleting this. By way of replacement, I propose providing greater detail on the contributors to the project. Any objections?

Regards, Jim Page (Australia) April 5, 2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamessmithpage ( talkcontribs) 10:35, 6 April 2009 (UTC) reply

/* GIGAP Membership */ table

I wikitabled the membership as it was difficult to read in in-line format. -- ProfPolySci45 ( talk) 06:51, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook