This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. South Africa: Politics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the South African politics task force.

any improvements needed?Ř

Oh yes. Why is it that this article exists at all on Wikipedia? Because this law was a foundation of apartheid. Most/many other laws referred to it. It was a primary mechanism for establishing and retaining White privelege. So, to give the NP / (White) South African government's summary of the act, the Animal Farm "separate but equal" nonsense is POV! Shame! Paul Beardsell 18:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC) reply

What changed with the law put in place 41.216.204.48 ( talk) 16:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC) reply