This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Iran may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
It is requested that a map or maps be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in Iran may be able to help! |
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Iran may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
An image used in this article,
File:Excavation at the Gorgan great wall 2010.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC) |
This claim in the tetshould be backed up. 200 km is not sooo impressive. The Roman limes (defense line) in southern Germania was more than 500 km. You may argue about the quality of fortification but as far as length goes it does not look like silver medal. Claim should be substantiated or removed. Kipala ( talk) 14:05, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Great Wall of Gorgan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:35, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
The article does not say how high the wall was, which might be of some importance. Was it high enough to present a barrier in its own right, even when undefended? Or was it relatively low and only useful when manned at every point? The distances between forts were substantial so to be effective it would either have to have been high and difficult to climb or densely manned. Bill ( talk) 22:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Iran may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
It is requested that a map or maps be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in Iran may be able to help! |
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Iran may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
An image used in this article,
File:Excavation at the Gorgan great wall 2010.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC) |
This claim in the tetshould be backed up. 200 km is not sooo impressive. The Roman limes (defense line) in southern Germania was more than 500 km. You may argue about the quality of fortification but as far as length goes it does not look like silver medal. Claim should be substantiated or removed. Kipala ( talk) 14:05, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Great Wall of Gorgan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:35, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
The article does not say how high the wall was, which might be of some importance. Was it high enough to present a barrier in its own right, even when undefended? Or was it relatively low and only useful when manned at every point? The distances between forts were substantial so to be effective it would either have to have been high and difficult to climb or densely manned. Bill ( talk) 22:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)