 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The edit on 12:17, 27 April 2021 by Ondřej Knížek is welcome with much useful info. However, it also seems to have the style/tone of Original Research (written from the "we" perspective: "we measured.." "we can see/expect.." etc) and original interpretation (of the charts). It also added 2 of the same references about 9 times (self-promotion?) (and requires some amount of grammatical fixing). In general it -sounds- scientific but I am not an expert and am unsure how much should be kept. 67.181.54.51 ( talk) 03:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
| This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The edit on 12:17, 27 April 2021 by Ondřej Knížek is welcome with much useful info. However, it also seems to have the style/tone of Original Research (written from the "we" perspective: "we measured.." "we can see/expect.." etc) and original interpretation (of the charts). It also added 2 of the same references about 9 times (self-promotion?) (and requires some amount of grammatical fixing). In general it -sounds- scientific but I am not an expert and am unsure how much should be kept. 67.181.54.51 ( talk) 03:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)