![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Graupel now redirects here. The following text is from Talk:Graupel, showing the reasons for the redirect:
This page seems to disagree substantially with the dictionary definition of graupel. Why? Matt Gies 18:39, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
The first sentence currently reads: "Graupel (also called snow pellets) refers to precipitation that forms when freezing fog forms 2–5 mm balls of rime ice around a center snowflake." What does "center snowflake" mean here? Is this just a typo? Schi 19:33, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
I oppose merging this article with
snow pellets.I endorse merging Snow Pellets with this article. If anything, the reverse should be true. The stated reason for the tag is that we "already have an article on snow pellets", which is fine, but graupel is the better term in my opinion, and this article contains more information, having better structure and content. This article also already has a talk page with a number of edits, compared with no such page for
snow pellets, and has already been assessed. The sum of which would imply that
WP:NAME in this instance would side with
graupel, which is would apparently be the name most interested people would be likely to look for. --
Crimsone
18:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Graupel now redirects here. The following text is from Talk:Graupel, showing the reasons for the redirect:
This page seems to disagree substantially with the dictionary definition of graupel. Why? Matt Gies 18:39, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
The first sentence currently reads: "Graupel (also called snow pellets) refers to precipitation that forms when freezing fog forms 2–5 mm balls of rime ice around a center snowflake." What does "center snowflake" mean here? Is this just a typo? Schi 19:33, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
I oppose merging this article with
snow pellets.I endorse merging Snow Pellets with this article. If anything, the reverse should be true. The stated reason for the tag is that we "already have an article on snow pellets", which is fine, but graupel is the better term in my opinion, and this article contains more information, having better structure and content. This article also already has a talk page with a number of edits, compared with no such page for
snow pellets, and has already been assessed. The sum of which would imply that
WP:NAME in this instance would side with
graupel, which is would apparently be the name most interested people would be likely to look for. --
Crimsone
18:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)