This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Grand Central Terminal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Grand Central Terminal has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Material from
Grand Central Terminal was split to other pages. The former page's
history now serves to
provide attribution for that content in the latter pages, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter pages exist. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
|
Toolbox |
---|
Placing the station logo image in the name field sets the logo on a white background unnecessarily. In my opinion, it looks bad, or at least less than optimal. It looks like a jpeg image without a transparent background. The white background is inherated from the faux sign design generated by the name field. The template is trying to include the image, like it's placed on the sign. The "type" field makes equally little sense, but with the added benefit that the image displays on a transparent background. If the issue of the image displaying above or below the " Metro-North Railroad terminal" text can be overcome by placing the logo before or after the text. -- RickyCourtney ( talk) 22:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
25, 2023, 16:30 - «Restored revision 1171637845 by Certes talk): Common term, see MOS:OVERLINK»
AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 17:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
As of Special:Diff/1198471696 the article no longer fits into technical limitations on templates, as can be seen by missing transclusion of Template:Navboxes at the bottom.
The prose size is 11626 words, which per WP:SIZERULE:
> 9,000 words Probably should be divided or trimmed, though the scope of a topic can sometimes justify the added reading material
Section § History should probably be trimmed down to a summary of corresponding article History of Grand Central Terminal. — andrybak ( talk) 19:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Grand Central Terminal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Grand Central Terminal has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Material from
Grand Central Terminal was split to other pages. The former page's
history now serves to
provide attribution for that content in the latter pages, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter pages exist. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
|
Toolbox |
---|
Placing the station logo image in the name field sets the logo on a white background unnecessarily. In my opinion, it looks bad, or at least less than optimal. It looks like a jpeg image without a transparent background. The white background is inherated from the faux sign design generated by the name field. The template is trying to include the image, like it's placed on the sign. The "type" field makes equally little sense, but with the added benefit that the image displays on a transparent background. If the issue of the image displaying above or below the " Metro-North Railroad terminal" text can be overcome by placing the logo before or after the text. -- RickyCourtney ( talk) 22:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
25, 2023, 16:30 - «Restored revision 1171637845 by Certes talk): Common term, see MOS:OVERLINK»
AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 17:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
As of Special:Diff/1198471696 the article no longer fits into technical limitations on templates, as can be seen by missing transclusion of Template:Navboxes at the bottom.
The prose size is 11626 words, which per WP:SIZERULE:
> 9,000 words Probably should be divided or trimmed, though the scope of a topic can sometimes justify the added reading material
Section § History should probably be trimmed down to a summary of corresponding article History of Grand Central Terminal. — andrybak ( talk) 19:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)