Grade I listed buildings in Monmouthshire is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on November 22, 2019. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think the new tabular format for this, and the other Listed Buildings in Wales entries, is very good. But I think it has two significant weaknesses. Firstly, we've lost the links from the list pages to the individual buildings themselves. Secondly, the entries appear in the order of their HB number rather than alphabetically. Thus Llanvihangel Court, and the Stables at Llanvihangel Court appear almost at opposite ends of the table. Moreover, I do not think the HB categorisations are at all well known. Looking at the entry on Grade I listed buildings in Greater Manchester, User:Nev1 has adopted a similar tabular format but has retained the links to individual entries and the alphabetic format, both of which I think make the list , and its individual entries, much more accesible.
I'd appreciate other views. KJP1 ( talk) 06:58, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
I do like the tabular format in principle, but have some comments. BTW, I'm new to Wikipedia as an editor, but am a long time user.
Hope this is helpful. I'm trying to do some edits on the pages for listed buildings (and monuments) in Torfaen, but will try to do some work on the Monmouthshire pages after. Hoping to do a photo trip to SE Wales soon to add some photos.
Some more general points on lists and things:
Definitely think there is room for some cross-pollination and standardization in these areas. -- Robevans123 ( talk) 09:05, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm not at all sure I would agree with the assessment of this article as being of "Low" importance to the Wikipedia Wales Project. Low Importance articles are defined as being of "little importance to th(e) project, but cover(ing) a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia." I think a list of the most important buildings in one of Wales's counties counts as more than an "obscure piece of trivia". I would actually rate it High, based on a criterion of "fairly important, covering a general area of knowledge." Looking at a small sample of articles currently rated of High importance, I find Arthur Gould, a 19th century rugby player, Castell Coch, a single Grade 1 Listed Building, Diana, Princess of Wales, ?? and Gavin & Stacey. Something not quite right on the calibrations? Thoughts? KJP1 ( talk) 06:33, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Have changed the Wales: Project Importance Rating to High - "The article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge." I think this better reflects the importance of the article to an understanding of Wales than the original Low. Others may disagree, in which case let's discuss it here. KJP1 ( talk) 08:38, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:23, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Grade I listed buildings in Monmouthshire is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on November 22, 2019. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think the new tabular format for this, and the other Listed Buildings in Wales entries, is very good. But I think it has two significant weaknesses. Firstly, we've lost the links from the list pages to the individual buildings themselves. Secondly, the entries appear in the order of their HB number rather than alphabetically. Thus Llanvihangel Court, and the Stables at Llanvihangel Court appear almost at opposite ends of the table. Moreover, I do not think the HB categorisations are at all well known. Looking at the entry on Grade I listed buildings in Greater Manchester, User:Nev1 has adopted a similar tabular format but has retained the links to individual entries and the alphabetic format, both of which I think make the list , and its individual entries, much more accesible.
I'd appreciate other views. KJP1 ( talk) 06:58, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
I do like the tabular format in principle, but have some comments. BTW, I'm new to Wikipedia as an editor, but am a long time user.
Hope this is helpful. I'm trying to do some edits on the pages for listed buildings (and monuments) in Torfaen, but will try to do some work on the Monmouthshire pages after. Hoping to do a photo trip to SE Wales soon to add some photos.
Some more general points on lists and things:
Definitely think there is room for some cross-pollination and standardization in these areas. -- Robevans123 ( talk) 09:05, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm not at all sure I would agree with the assessment of this article as being of "Low" importance to the Wikipedia Wales Project. Low Importance articles are defined as being of "little importance to th(e) project, but cover(ing) a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia." I think a list of the most important buildings in one of Wales's counties counts as more than an "obscure piece of trivia". I would actually rate it High, based on a criterion of "fairly important, covering a general area of knowledge." Looking at a small sample of articles currently rated of High importance, I find Arthur Gould, a 19th century rugby player, Castell Coch, a single Grade 1 Listed Building, Diana, Princess of Wales, ?? and Gavin & Stacey. Something not quite right on the calibrations? Thoughts? KJP1 ( talk) 06:33, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Have changed the Wales: Project Importance Rating to High - "The article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge." I think this better reflects the importance of the article to an understanding of Wales than the original Low. Others may disagree, in which case let's discuss it here. KJP1 ( talk) 08:38, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:23, 8 December 2022 (UTC)