This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
So I do see the argument about the links. But in this case there are an exact number of departments that make up the civil service arm of the Government of South Australia. Would you likewise argue that it's inappropriate to enumerate and describe those in the article? Presumably if they were added in that fashion, links to the departments would be OK? Osterby 01:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
I added in an external link to the youth arm of the government, given the demographics of Wikipedia I thought it may be of interest. Triki-wiki 01:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Triki-wiki
such as that
-- 58.38.44.209 ( talk) 08:13, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I'm planning on adding articles for Bannon Government(6 articles use it), Arnold Government(3 articles use it), Brown Government(222 articles use it - not all for SA), Olsen Government(5 articles use it), Kerin Government(4 articles use it), Rann Government(27 articles use it), Weatherill Government(1 articles use it) or Bannon Labor Government(5 articles use it), Arnold Labor Government(0 articles use it), Brown Liberal Government(2 articles use it), Olsen Liberal Government(5 articles use it), Kerin Liberal Government(3 articles use it), Rann Labor Government(11 articles use it), Weatherill Labor Government(2 articles use it). What is your opinion on this? They are common terms used in Wikipedia and the media and reliable sources. If there is a better place to discuss this I am happy for you to move this there. Maybe here. Philiashasspots ( talk) 11:44, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
We are able to do this with federal governments due to the number of sources available. This hasn't been done with state governments due to a lack of sources available. What would your sources be? Timeshift ( talk) 06:00, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
The Corporation Called the South Australian Government
Why is it left out that the SA Government is a business? Registered with A.B.N. 050208921, and other departments also, such as the Company called the South Australian Police A.B.N. 93799021552. It is not for ease of transferring information as has been put to the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.3.171.129 ( talk) 23:58, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi there. I've just restructured this article as it was starting to have list-like properties. All the agencies have been transferred to List of South Australian government agencies and then just a brief summary of each department. I've also added the ministry, as this is an important part of government (more important than agencies). Do we need a brief summary of Parliament? Feedback, as always, is welcome. Rangasyd ( talk) 16:02, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Since Geoff Brock's resignation, and a reshuffle - this and the Cabinet and ministry articles. InDaily article 15 April. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 04:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
So I do see the argument about the links. But in this case there are an exact number of departments that make up the civil service arm of the Government of South Australia. Would you likewise argue that it's inappropriate to enumerate and describe those in the article? Presumably if they were added in that fashion, links to the departments would be OK? Osterby 01:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
I added in an external link to the youth arm of the government, given the demographics of Wikipedia I thought it may be of interest. Triki-wiki 01:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Triki-wiki
such as that
-- 58.38.44.209 ( talk) 08:13, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I'm planning on adding articles for Bannon Government(6 articles use it), Arnold Government(3 articles use it), Brown Government(222 articles use it - not all for SA), Olsen Government(5 articles use it), Kerin Government(4 articles use it), Rann Government(27 articles use it), Weatherill Government(1 articles use it) or Bannon Labor Government(5 articles use it), Arnold Labor Government(0 articles use it), Brown Liberal Government(2 articles use it), Olsen Liberal Government(5 articles use it), Kerin Liberal Government(3 articles use it), Rann Labor Government(11 articles use it), Weatherill Labor Government(2 articles use it). What is your opinion on this? They are common terms used in Wikipedia and the media and reliable sources. If there is a better place to discuss this I am happy for you to move this there. Maybe here. Philiashasspots ( talk) 11:44, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
We are able to do this with federal governments due to the number of sources available. This hasn't been done with state governments due to a lack of sources available. What would your sources be? Timeshift ( talk) 06:00, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
The Corporation Called the South Australian Government
Why is it left out that the SA Government is a business? Registered with A.B.N. 050208921, and other departments also, such as the Company called the South Australian Police A.B.N. 93799021552. It is not for ease of transferring information as has been put to the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.3.171.129 ( talk) 23:58, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi there. I've just restructured this article as it was starting to have list-like properties. All the agencies have been transferred to List of South Australian government agencies and then just a brief summary of each department. I've also added the ministry, as this is an important part of government (more important than agencies). Do we need a brief summary of Parliament? Feedback, as always, is welcome. Rangasyd ( talk) 16:02, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Since Geoff Brock's resignation, and a reshuffle - this and the Cabinet and ministry articles. InDaily article 15 April. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 04:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)