This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a map or maps be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in Asia may be able to help! |
Deletion Physchim62 22:51, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Why deleting this article??? It is still in Progress and i will try to expand it as best as i could. Whlee 22:54, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Hello, Whlee. I was wondering if you wrote, or have permission to use, the content in the First Koryo - Khitan article because it is similar to an article on the Korean History Project website. Thanks -- Kjkolb 05:28, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
I understand what you are talking about, i recongnize the fact that the article is poorly written but i'm very busy these last few days. I will personalize it the following days when i got much more available extra-time. Regards. Whlee 10:24, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
I don't understand this section at all
Should it be
However, this doesn't make any sense, as the Qin dynasties were all at least 600 years before. This all takes place during the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms Period
-- Awiseman 16:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
"Threatened by Khitan expansion, Balhae sought assistance from the declining Silla. Records stated that Balhae also requested Goryeo's help during the Later Three Kingdoms period just before its fall, but under the conflicting state between Balhae and Silla, the aggression of the Khitan into Balhae could not be blocked because Silla and Goryeo rather helped Khitan in spite of the treaty with Balhae because of the adherence of confrontation between the south and the north, along the Northern-Southern Kingdom period (Hangul : 남ë¶êµ/남ë¶ì‹œëŒ€, Hanja :å—北國/å—北時代). From that point, Goryeo and Khitan had not showed any hostility each other until the fall of Balhae in 926."
I can't make heads of tails of it. -- Awiseman 16:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Somebody reverted GoGuryeo's edits saying they were too Korea focused. i think GoGuryeo's edits are fine, what do you think? -- AW 15:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
It is an insistence only of Korea. It is not a universal opinion. Will you steal not only the history of Japan but also the history of China? Please write not the slander but a concrete opinion. --
219.66.42.121 19:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Hmm I looked over the article. It really needs some work on it. However, it might be difficult to find more information on this article since the wars took place long ago and there are few references. I'll try and root through Korean encyclopedias. Keep up the good work Good friend100 04:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Sino-Xiongnu War - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 22:22, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Goryeo–Khitan_War was copied or moved into First_conflict_in_the_Goryeo–Khitan_War with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
De 4 de 171 ( talk) 04:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
@ User:Rajmaan - I appreciate your contributions, but the result field should reflect the final outcome of the entire war, not the results of every conflict that took place during the war. For example, in the World War II article, the result field only mentions the final Allied Victory, not the Fall of France and other major campaigns that resulted in Allied defeats. BlackRanger88 ( talk) 18:41, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello @ Qiushufang
I know Wikipedia's policy on self publishing, but I kept Walker's source because according to Wikipedia:Selfpub it says "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications."
I dug around, Walker while self published is an expert with a PhD from UCLA. Walker authored The Weight of Tradition: Preliminary Observations on Korea's Intellectual Response (published by The Korea Research and Publications, Inc.). https://books.google.com/books?id=m85lCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA297
and
The Yi-Ming Rapprochement: Sino-Korean Foreign Relations, 1392-1592 (published by University of California, Los Angeles)
https://books.google.com/books?id=QHuOswEACAAJ
He's also variously cited by others:
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=Hugh+Dyson+Walker
https://www.jstor.org/action/doBasicSearch?Query=Hugh+Dyson+Walker
Since he is a cited expert and because he does appear to have been published at different times by institutions I think he should be added back. Sunnyediting99 ( talk) 02:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a map or maps be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in Asia may be able to help! |
Deletion Physchim62 22:51, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Why deleting this article??? It is still in Progress and i will try to expand it as best as i could. Whlee 22:54, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Hello, Whlee. I was wondering if you wrote, or have permission to use, the content in the First Koryo - Khitan article because it is similar to an article on the Korean History Project website. Thanks -- Kjkolb 05:28, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
I understand what you are talking about, i recongnize the fact that the article is poorly written but i'm very busy these last few days. I will personalize it the following days when i got much more available extra-time. Regards. Whlee 10:24, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
I don't understand this section at all
Should it be
However, this doesn't make any sense, as the Qin dynasties were all at least 600 years before. This all takes place during the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms Period
-- Awiseman 16:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
"Threatened by Khitan expansion, Balhae sought assistance from the declining Silla. Records stated that Balhae also requested Goryeo's help during the Later Three Kingdoms period just before its fall, but under the conflicting state between Balhae and Silla, the aggression of the Khitan into Balhae could not be blocked because Silla and Goryeo rather helped Khitan in spite of the treaty with Balhae because of the adherence of confrontation between the south and the north, along the Northern-Southern Kingdom period (Hangul : 남ë¶êµ/남ë¶ì‹œëŒ€, Hanja :å—北國/å—北時代). From that point, Goryeo and Khitan had not showed any hostility each other until the fall of Balhae in 926."
I can't make heads of tails of it. -- Awiseman 16:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Somebody reverted GoGuryeo's edits saying they were too Korea focused. i think GoGuryeo's edits are fine, what do you think? -- AW 15:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
It is an insistence only of Korea. It is not a universal opinion. Will you steal not only the history of Japan but also the history of China? Please write not the slander but a concrete opinion. --
219.66.42.121 19:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Hmm I looked over the article. It really needs some work on it. However, it might be difficult to find more information on this article since the wars took place long ago and there are few references. I'll try and root through Korean encyclopedias. Keep up the good work Good friend100 04:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Sino-Xiongnu War - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 22:22, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Goryeo–Khitan_War was copied or moved into First_conflict_in_the_Goryeo–Khitan_War with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
De 4 de 171 ( talk) 04:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
@ User:Rajmaan - I appreciate your contributions, but the result field should reflect the final outcome of the entire war, not the results of every conflict that took place during the war. For example, in the World War II article, the result field only mentions the final Allied Victory, not the Fall of France and other major campaigns that resulted in Allied defeats. BlackRanger88 ( talk) 18:41, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello @ Qiushufang
I know Wikipedia's policy on self publishing, but I kept Walker's source because according to Wikipedia:Selfpub it says "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications."
I dug around, Walker while self published is an expert with a PhD from UCLA. Walker authored The Weight of Tradition: Preliminary Observations on Korea's Intellectual Response (published by The Korea Research and Publications, Inc.). https://books.google.com/books?id=m85lCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA297
and
The Yi-Ming Rapprochement: Sino-Korean Foreign Relations, 1392-1592 (published by University of California, Los Angeles)
https://books.google.com/books?id=QHuOswEACAAJ
He's also variously cited by others:
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=Hugh+Dyson+Walker
https://www.jstor.org/action/doBasicSearch?Query=Hugh+Dyson+Walker
Since he is a cited expert and because he does appear to have been published at different times by institutions I think he should be added back. Sunnyediting99 ( talk) 02:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)