While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
User RickK:
I have reviewed the reverts you have made. I will assume that you are acting in good faith, and that your actions are not intentionally malicious. Before bringing others in to review and correct your actions, I'd like to give you the opportunity to explain them. Of particular concern are:
We would like to keep Wikipedia a productive environment. As such, actions such as yours will be brought into question. Please address the above issues at your earliest convenience. -Rob
My comments and reasoning were put on one of your multiple of anon IDs, which you chose to delete without comment and with a personal attack. Rick K 08:29, Oct 3, 2004 (UTC)
User RickK appears to be unwilling to discuss his penchant for unexplained reverting, nor does he address the six issues listed above. Perhaps he is applying his previously stated position, so eloquently stated on his personal page:
The matter appears to be shelved for now. -Rob
Does this article really belong in the Biography WikiProject? And if it does, does that mean that each and every film that is (even remotely) biographical in nature belong there, too? — AnnaKucsma ( Talk to me!) 18:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
User RickK:
I have reviewed the reverts you have made. I will assume that you are acting in good faith, and that your actions are not intentionally malicious. Before bringing others in to review and correct your actions, I'd like to give you the opportunity to explain them. Of particular concern are:
We would like to keep Wikipedia a productive environment. As such, actions such as yours will be brought into question. Please address the above issues at your earliest convenience. -Rob
My comments and reasoning were put on one of your multiple of anon IDs, which you chose to delete without comment and with a personal attack. Rick K 08:29, Oct 3, 2004 (UTC)
User RickK appears to be unwilling to discuss his penchant for unexplained reverting, nor does he address the six issues listed above. Perhaps he is applying his previously stated position, so eloquently stated on his personal page:
The matter appears to be shelved for now. -Rob
Does this article really belong in the Biography WikiProject? And if it does, does that mean that each and every film that is (even remotely) biographical in nature belong there, too? — AnnaKucsma ( Talk to me!) 18:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)