This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and contribute to the
discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
It is true the there are 70 tombs of Koguryo kingdom in present day North Korea, but only 30 of these tombs belong to the world heritage site. Beacuse of this I have fixed the number in the article.
84.229.3.98 (
talk) 02:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Possible useful information in duplicate article
A duplicate article which was sent to AfD and eventually redirected here, might contain some useful (albeit unsourced) information that might be merged into this article by an editor with knowledge of the subject. You can find
the other article in its page history. The AfD discussion can be found
here. --
Reinoutr (
talk) 14:57, 2 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Requested move 19 March 2018
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Thanks. --
Garam (
talk) 13:20, 19 March 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. —usernamekiran
(talk) 17:48, 26 March 2018 (UTC)reply
(I changed my mind. Please see "Comment" below.) --
Garam (
talk) 07:24, 3 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Moving this down to the next line prevents it from being relisted by the proposer. See
WP:RM#Relisting: "The decision to relist a discussion is best left to uninvolved experienced editors upon considering, but declining, to close the discussion" (emphasis added).
Dekimasuよ! 22:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Wikipedia uses
Goguryeo elsewhere, and this shouldn't be moved unless that is. UNESCO's chosen name doesn't necessarily correlate with what we call sites. UNESCO says this is in "South Phyongan Province, Nampho, South Hwangghae Province," whereas we say it's at
Nampo and
South Pyongan Province and
South Hwanghae Province.
Dekimasuよ! 15:42, 19 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Well, but this artilce is about a "World Heritage Site" of UNESCO. This means, it is also international and official name. Thanks. --
Garam (
talk) 17:52, 23 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Nonsense - see below. The UNESCO names are often best ignored, as here.
Johnbod (
talk) 21:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Neutral, but while we are looking at it, the "Complex of" should probably be dropped. It's only there because of UNESCO, who are often a rather bad guide as far as names go, because their material tends never to go through the hands of a native English-speaker. Most archaeological "complexes" do not carry this at the start of their names in this way, in RS or in WP.
Johnbod (
talk) 16:00, 19 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Well, sometimes it clearly has a wrong word, but also it is proper names, like "
Democracy Party". So, I think we should respect that names. Thanks. --
Garam (
talk) 08:25, 24 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Hmm. Let's be honest, your English isn't that good, is it?
Johnbod (
talk) 00:22, 27 March 2018 (UTC)reply
I don't understand why you say it to me in this issue. And my point is, "Democracy Party" (not "Democratic Party") is not the common name about democratic parties in English language. --
Garam (
talk) 12:26, 27 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Koguryo tombs or Goguryeo tombs (without the capped Tomb, as Johnbod's links show) would be OK. If you want a proper name, then the Unesco name makes sense: Complex of Koguryo Tombs; the other "Complex" title is probably just a transliteration of that back to the alternate spelling.
Dicklyon (
talk) 02:45, 27 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment: Umm, I changed my mind after reading other options. So, I think that it's okay to change article name to "Koguryo tombs", as per user Dicklyon's opinion. Thanks. --
Garam (
talk) 12:26, 27 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and contribute to the
discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
It is true the there are 70 tombs of Koguryo kingdom in present day North Korea, but only 30 of these tombs belong to the world heritage site. Beacuse of this I have fixed the number in the article.
84.229.3.98 (
talk) 02:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Possible useful information in duplicate article
A duplicate article which was sent to AfD and eventually redirected here, might contain some useful (albeit unsourced) information that might be merged into this article by an editor with knowledge of the subject. You can find
the other article in its page history. The AfD discussion can be found
here. --
Reinoutr (
talk) 14:57, 2 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Requested move 19 March 2018
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Thanks. --
Garam (
talk) 13:20, 19 March 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. —usernamekiran
(talk) 17:48, 26 March 2018 (UTC)reply
(I changed my mind. Please see "Comment" below.) --
Garam (
talk) 07:24, 3 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Moving this down to the next line prevents it from being relisted by the proposer. See
WP:RM#Relisting: "The decision to relist a discussion is best left to uninvolved experienced editors upon considering, but declining, to close the discussion" (emphasis added).
Dekimasuよ! 22:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Wikipedia uses
Goguryeo elsewhere, and this shouldn't be moved unless that is. UNESCO's chosen name doesn't necessarily correlate with what we call sites. UNESCO says this is in "South Phyongan Province, Nampho, South Hwangghae Province," whereas we say it's at
Nampo and
South Pyongan Province and
South Hwanghae Province.
Dekimasuよ! 15:42, 19 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Well, but this artilce is about a "World Heritage Site" of UNESCO. This means, it is also international and official name. Thanks. --
Garam (
talk) 17:52, 23 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Nonsense - see below. The UNESCO names are often best ignored, as here.
Johnbod (
talk) 21:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Neutral, but while we are looking at it, the "Complex of" should probably be dropped. It's only there because of UNESCO, who are often a rather bad guide as far as names go, because their material tends never to go through the hands of a native English-speaker. Most archaeological "complexes" do not carry this at the start of their names in this way, in RS or in WP.
Johnbod (
talk) 16:00, 19 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Well, sometimes it clearly has a wrong word, but also it is proper names, like "
Democracy Party". So, I think we should respect that names. Thanks. --
Garam (
talk) 08:25, 24 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Hmm. Let's be honest, your English isn't that good, is it?
Johnbod (
talk) 00:22, 27 March 2018 (UTC)reply
I don't understand why you say it to me in this issue. And my point is, "Democracy Party" (not "Democratic Party") is not the common name about democratic parties in English language. --
Garam (
talk) 12:26, 27 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Koguryo tombs or Goguryeo tombs (without the capped Tomb, as Johnbod's links show) would be OK. If you want a proper name, then the Unesco name makes sense: Complex of Koguryo Tombs; the other "Complex" title is probably just a transliteration of that back to the alternate spelling.
Dicklyon (
talk) 02:45, 27 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment: Umm, I changed my mind after reading other options. So, I think that it's okay to change article name to "Koguryo tombs", as per user Dicklyon's opinion. Thanks. --
Garam (
talk) 12:26, 27 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.