![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR ( talk) 05:42, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Gog (disambiguation) → Gog — move to appropriate name - no article at proposed destination — B.Wind ( talk) 18:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.GOG and Gog should direct to the same page per WP:PRECISION ("If two or more pages differ only in small details of spelling (including use of diacritics and capitalization) it may be advisable to combine the pages or provide links between the pages to reduce confusion for readers and editors.") which I see User:B.Wind has already done. — AjaxSmack 03:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Without providing even the pretense that he wants to provide a source, User:Til Eulenspiegel claims that Gog and Magog are actual people, while accusing me of POV-pushing.
Can someone please explain him that Wikipedia is based on WP:RELIABLE sources? Thanks. -- 91.10.59.75 ( talk) 12:34, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
The revert is because you moved them to the fiction section, which seems to be pushing the point of view that the Bible is fiction, and appears to be tendentious editing. Til Eulenspiegel ( talk) 13:01, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
My edit pointed out, that GOG is a polish company, depite it's registered in Cyprus. Horgelblob reverted my edit without any explanation. Horgerblob - please explain the reason, other people - please comment on that. 123unoduetre ( talk) 10:48, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR ( talk) 05:42, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Gog (disambiguation) → Gog — move to appropriate name - no article at proposed destination — B.Wind ( talk) 18:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.GOG and Gog should direct to the same page per WP:PRECISION ("If two or more pages differ only in small details of spelling (including use of diacritics and capitalization) it may be advisable to combine the pages or provide links between the pages to reduce confusion for readers and editors.") which I see User:B.Wind has already done. — AjaxSmack 03:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Without providing even the pretense that he wants to provide a source, User:Til Eulenspiegel claims that Gog and Magog are actual people, while accusing me of POV-pushing.
Can someone please explain him that Wikipedia is based on WP:RELIABLE sources? Thanks. -- 91.10.59.75 ( talk) 12:34, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
The revert is because you moved them to the fiction section, which seems to be pushing the point of view that the Bible is fiction, and appears to be tendentious editing. Til Eulenspiegel ( talk) 13:01, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
My edit pointed out, that GOG is a polish company, depite it's registered in Cyprus. Horgelblob reverted my edit without any explanation. Horgerblob - please explain the reason, other people - please comment on that. 123unoduetre ( talk) 10:48, 6 July 2013 (UTC)