Gnostic Apocalypse of Peter has been listed as one of the
Philosophy and religion good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 5, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Mostly identifying information, no analysis but a couple of useful references and one main point of the text picked out.
Spidrak 18:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: SnowFire ( talk · contribs) 18:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Ghosts of Europa ( talk · contribs) Hello SnowFire. I love to see more editors tackling Gnosticism! I'm looking forward to reviewing this. 04:28, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
From a first read of the article, I don't see any major issues. Unless otherwise mentioned, any suggestions I make are optional and not blockers for GA.
"Peter, you are to be become perfect"- Is this an accurate quote, or a typo?
Jesus tells Peter that they are blind- Who does "they" refer to in this sentence? The ambiguity could imply Peter and Jesus himself are blind!
The author was probably Egyptiansolely based on the source saying
The reference within the text to “dry canals,” revised from the “dry springs” of 2 Peter, seems to suggest an Egyptian setting for the text at some stage of composition, translation, or transmission, and on the basis of this sort of evidence Birger A. Pearson prefers to assign the text to “third-century Egypt, probably Alexandria.”? If so, I think saying "probably Egyptian" in Wikivoice is too strong.
Great job on the article!
Thanks for taking a look! SnowFire ( talk) 05:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks again for the review. Re the comments above...
Gnostic Apocalypse of Peter has been listed as one of the
Philosophy and religion good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 5, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Mostly identifying information, no analysis but a couple of useful references and one main point of the text picked out.
Spidrak 18:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: SnowFire ( talk · contribs) 18:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Ghosts of Europa ( talk · contribs) Hello SnowFire. I love to see more editors tackling Gnosticism! I'm looking forward to reviewing this. 04:28, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
From a first read of the article, I don't see any major issues. Unless otherwise mentioned, any suggestions I make are optional and not blockers for GA.
"Peter, you are to be become perfect"- Is this an accurate quote, or a typo?
Jesus tells Peter that they are blind- Who does "they" refer to in this sentence? The ambiguity could imply Peter and Jesus himself are blind!
The author was probably Egyptiansolely based on the source saying
The reference within the text to “dry canals,” revised from the “dry springs” of 2 Peter, seems to suggest an Egyptian setting for the text at some stage of composition, translation, or transmission, and on the basis of this sort of evidence Birger A. Pearson prefers to assign the text to “third-century Egypt, probably Alexandria.”? If so, I think saying "probably Egyptian" in Wikivoice is too strong.
Great job on the article!
Thanks for taking a look! SnowFire ( talk) 05:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks again for the review. Re the comments above...