![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't like the way this section is written. I would like to delete it all together until someone finds some sources. It's Algaecidal, I got that. Glutaraldehyde kills like almost everything living, that's nothing new. The more important thing to state is in what time frame it disinfects and sterilizes a given substrate or solution. It would be better to state the things it does not kill Like Prions. There are tons of cool things we could add to this page but If "you" may, lets stick to published sources for our information. ;D -William Cozzycovers 13:42, 11 December 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cozzycovers ( talk • contribs)
Articles about essential medicines typically follow the ordering of sections at WP:PHARMMOS.
Also the lead should provide a summary per WP:LEAD. A single sentence does not. Therefore restored. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 15:51, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Not sure why this was removed? Or the common brand names.
First sentence did state what it is "disinfectant and medication" So restored. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 17:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Disagree with this "( systematic name 1,5-pentanedial) is an organic compound, a dialdehyde with the chemical formula C5H8O2"
It does not say what it is which is "a disinfectant and medication" Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 19:03, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Agree with the above. Also trying to figure out why the citations for the first sentence in edit mode refer to references [1][2][3] but in view mode show (and direct to) [3][4][5]. Rosefirerising ( talk) 21:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Im at my wits end.
This is the MOST common use that a regular joe will run into glutaraldehyde. Wikipedia is the place people turn to when they lookup long names on labels.
The fact that this is in common use in every aquarium store and petco across the country should be noted on this article.
However i cant seem to find any source that certain people will accept. Photographs of the ingredient label? rejected. The official website of the manufacture? rejected. A sourced non scholarly article on its use in this field? rejected.
so, who can help me find a source that will stand up to any potentially pedantic future review?
TheAuthoritativeSource (
talk) 22:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Substance Identifier "111-30-8 ">substances (1)>get references (49224)>refine "2002-" (36764)>refine "Review" (265)>
Before delete content please give sound reason on talk section. If there is hundred of publication about our burden to mention as much as we can not to delete content with some reactionary actions. Changes should be made in order to inform the public about a dangerous and useful chemical, which has a very common usage area and causes some environmental problems at the same time. Please keep this responsibility in mind when making changes. Some sources may be special sources, and their usage areas can be explained by showing more comprehensive sources on the subject. The way to do this is not to reduce sentences from this title, but to organize the sources. @ Smokefoot In particular, this person undoes the changes made in the editing of the page with a sarcastic and humiliating attitude and deletes the content from the page.
As can be seen, the usage areas of the related chemical are quite wide and only a few of them have been mentioned on this page yet. 38.54.105.33 ( talk) 04:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't like the way this section is written. I would like to delete it all together until someone finds some sources. It's Algaecidal, I got that. Glutaraldehyde kills like almost everything living, that's nothing new. The more important thing to state is in what time frame it disinfects and sterilizes a given substrate or solution. It would be better to state the things it does not kill Like Prions. There are tons of cool things we could add to this page but If "you" may, lets stick to published sources for our information. ;D -William Cozzycovers 13:42, 11 December 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cozzycovers ( talk • contribs)
Articles about essential medicines typically follow the ordering of sections at WP:PHARMMOS.
Also the lead should provide a summary per WP:LEAD. A single sentence does not. Therefore restored. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 15:51, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Not sure why this was removed? Or the common brand names.
First sentence did state what it is "disinfectant and medication" So restored. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 17:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Disagree with this "( systematic name 1,5-pentanedial) is an organic compound, a dialdehyde with the chemical formula C5H8O2"
It does not say what it is which is "a disinfectant and medication" Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 19:03, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Agree with the above. Also trying to figure out why the citations for the first sentence in edit mode refer to references [1][2][3] but in view mode show (and direct to) [3][4][5]. Rosefirerising ( talk) 21:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Im at my wits end.
This is the MOST common use that a regular joe will run into glutaraldehyde. Wikipedia is the place people turn to when they lookup long names on labels.
The fact that this is in common use in every aquarium store and petco across the country should be noted on this article.
However i cant seem to find any source that certain people will accept. Photographs of the ingredient label? rejected. The official website of the manufacture? rejected. A sourced non scholarly article on its use in this field? rejected.
so, who can help me find a source that will stand up to any potentially pedantic future review?
TheAuthoritativeSource (
talk) 22:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Substance Identifier "111-30-8 ">substances (1)>get references (49224)>refine "2002-" (36764)>refine "Review" (265)>
Before delete content please give sound reason on talk section. If there is hundred of publication about our burden to mention as much as we can not to delete content with some reactionary actions. Changes should be made in order to inform the public about a dangerous and useful chemical, which has a very common usage area and causes some environmental problems at the same time. Please keep this responsibility in mind when making changes. Some sources may be special sources, and their usage areas can be explained by showing more comprehensive sources on the subject. The way to do this is not to reduce sentences from this title, but to organize the sources. @ Smokefoot In particular, this person undoes the changes made in the editing of the page with a sarcastic and humiliating attitude and deletes the content from the page.
As can be seen, the usage areas of the related chemical are quite wide and only a few of them have been mentioned on this page yet. 38.54.105.33 ( talk) 04:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)