This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Is there a reason to have this article separate from the more general one on
mulled wine? It hardly provides more information that what is already in the other article.
91.178.99.143 (
talk) 13:13, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose The Scandinavian drink can be made with either
distilled spirit or
wine. --
Maumivi (
talk) 11:51, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Blocked sock.
Dekimasuよ! 21:32, 17 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose Similar drinks from different geographic origins can be described in separate articles. (e.g.
Soju,
Shōchū, and
Shāojiǔ) --
Brett (
talk) 20:23, 5 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose Glogg is a variety of mulled wine, so therefore, Both Glühwein and Glogg should get their own article, — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2604:2000:1403:434F:3C39:354D:DE15:BABB (
talk) 05:48, 24 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge! all the information here can be merged into the
Mulled wine article. We don't need a separate article for the translation of "mulled wine" in every language.
Soju,
Shōchū, and
Shāojiǔ are different enough for separate articles.
(Heroeswithmetaphors)talk 01:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Strongly oppose and close discussion. Glögg has a distinctive Scandinavian tradition and is not necessarily specifically wine; both non-alcoholic versions, and versions based on distilled spirits, are popular. Also, it is the concepts we are trying to describe that are decisive, not the current content of the article. And the commonality expressed in the article on "mulled wine" may be an argument for continued existence of that overarching article, but is not an argument against continued existence of specific articles on the variants.
As usual, merging is a euphemism for deletion; the overarching article on mulled wine is going to exist anyway, so the real question is whether the specific article on glögg should cease to exist. No; it should remain!
This discussion has been going on for nearly a year now, with little support (in either numbers or strength of argument) for "merging" (= deletion). Time to close.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Not moved. See no general agreement below to rename this article as nominated. There appears to be previous disagreement with a merge to
Mulled wine, so the main questions must be, "Is this article about a subject that is notable and should be kept? or should its lack of notability mean that it should be deleted and the title redirected to
Mulled wine#Nordic glögg? and aren't those questions better answered by an
AfD discussion?"
Kudos to editors for your input, and
Happy Publishing! (
nac by
page mover) Paine Ellsworth, ed.
put'r there 15:19, 24 December 2018 (UTC)reply
@
In ictu oculi: Or to the Anglicized
Glogg (which is listed in the dictionaries). Both works for me. --
Brett (
talk) 06:50, 7 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Strong oppose Glogg, but support
Glögg the vowel is part of the spelling as per Oxford.
In ictu oculi (
talk) 09:23, 7 December 2018 (UTC)reply
SupportGlögg; opposeGlogg. Wikipedia does not have technical limitations that prevent the correct spelling. —
AjaxSmack 02:53, 8 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose and redirect to
Mulled wine or
Mulled wine#Nordic glögg, which already has as much information as this article.
Glögg is already a long-standing redirect to
Mulled wine, undisturbed for over 10 years.
Glogg was previously merged and redirected to
Mulled wine in 2007,
Glogi has redirected to
Mulled wine since 2008. Also, this article is translated directly from the Finnish Wikipedia, so it would seem strange to change the title to the Swedish version.
Dekimasuよ! 21:58, 12 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose move, Support this alternative. Well researched and argued.
Andrewa (
talk) 01:29, 13 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Same as Dekimasu. I'd prefer the redirect go to the subsection, but either way would be fine. All variants should go to the same place, though.
Dohn joe (
talk) 02:18, 18 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Is there a reason to have this article separate from the more general one on
mulled wine? It hardly provides more information that what is already in the other article.
91.178.99.143 (
talk) 13:13, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose The Scandinavian drink can be made with either
distilled spirit or
wine. --
Maumivi (
talk) 11:51, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Blocked sock.
Dekimasuよ! 21:32, 17 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose Similar drinks from different geographic origins can be described in separate articles. (e.g.
Soju,
Shōchū, and
Shāojiǔ) --
Brett (
talk) 20:23, 5 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose Glogg is a variety of mulled wine, so therefore, Both Glühwein and Glogg should get their own article, — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2604:2000:1403:434F:3C39:354D:DE15:BABB (
talk) 05:48, 24 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge! all the information here can be merged into the
Mulled wine article. We don't need a separate article for the translation of "mulled wine" in every language.
Soju,
Shōchū, and
Shāojiǔ are different enough for separate articles.
(Heroeswithmetaphors)talk 01:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Strongly oppose and close discussion. Glögg has a distinctive Scandinavian tradition and is not necessarily specifically wine; both non-alcoholic versions, and versions based on distilled spirits, are popular. Also, it is the concepts we are trying to describe that are decisive, not the current content of the article. And the commonality expressed in the article on "mulled wine" may be an argument for continued existence of that overarching article, but is not an argument against continued existence of specific articles on the variants.
As usual, merging is a euphemism for deletion; the overarching article on mulled wine is going to exist anyway, so the real question is whether the specific article on glögg should cease to exist. No; it should remain!
This discussion has been going on for nearly a year now, with little support (in either numbers or strength of argument) for "merging" (= deletion). Time to close.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Not moved. See no general agreement below to rename this article as nominated. There appears to be previous disagreement with a merge to
Mulled wine, so the main questions must be, "Is this article about a subject that is notable and should be kept? or should its lack of notability mean that it should be deleted and the title redirected to
Mulled wine#Nordic glögg? and aren't those questions better answered by an
AfD discussion?"
Kudos to editors for your input, and
Happy Publishing! (
nac by
page mover) Paine Ellsworth, ed.
put'r there 15:19, 24 December 2018 (UTC)reply
@
In ictu oculi: Or to the Anglicized
Glogg (which is listed in the dictionaries). Both works for me. --
Brett (
talk) 06:50, 7 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Strong oppose Glogg, but support
Glögg the vowel is part of the spelling as per Oxford.
In ictu oculi (
talk) 09:23, 7 December 2018 (UTC)reply
SupportGlögg; opposeGlogg. Wikipedia does not have technical limitations that prevent the correct spelling. —
AjaxSmack 02:53, 8 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose and redirect to
Mulled wine or
Mulled wine#Nordic glögg, which already has as much information as this article.
Glögg is already a long-standing redirect to
Mulled wine, undisturbed for over 10 years.
Glogg was previously merged and redirected to
Mulled wine in 2007,
Glogi has redirected to
Mulled wine since 2008. Also, this article is translated directly from the Finnish Wikipedia, so it would seem strange to change the title to the Swedish version.
Dekimasuよ! 21:58, 12 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose move, Support this alternative. Well researched and argued.
Andrewa (
talk) 01:29, 13 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Same as Dekimasu. I'd prefer the redirect go to the subsection, but either way would be fine. All variants should go to the same place, though.
Dohn joe (
talk) 02:18, 18 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.