Give Me a Ring Sometime has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 17, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To Lihaas: Is citing the plot really necessary? Let's look at Avatar's plot. I wanted to discuss this in your talk page, but it needs archiving. -- George Ho ( talk) 14:42, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
As nobody has sided with the user proposing the merge, it is clear consensus at this time favors retaining the stand-alone article for this episode. Beeblebrox ( talk) 01:06, 14 October 2012 (UTC) |
There are already enough information about the pilot in Cheers (season 1). Why resurrecting it? The plot is not that impactful enough to benefit a stand-alone anymore, and reviews... image growing number of redundant reviews, good or bad. I realize that balancing the article is pointless if same information is already merged into the season article. " The Boys in the Bar" do have significant reviews enough to benefit a stand-alone, and " Coach's Daughter" may have some valuable reviews and production notes. The pilot... well, information already belongs to the season, and any other information is worthless. -- George Ho ( talk) 03:41, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Gabriel Yuji ( talk · contribs) 01:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
It looks great, but the are some issues:
Done all. -- George Ho ( talk) 00:52, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Sorry but I messed up... the plot detail was already included in the lead... I just rewrote it how it was before, but divided the paragraphs in a different way, and added a bit of proudction, which in fact wasn't included in the lead. I also broke the long "Casting" paragraph. Tell me what you think about its current state. Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 03:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm about to pass it, but first I'll do a source check. Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 04:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
I've just passed as it isn't a criteria to have the refs perfectly formatted, but I would suggest to use cite web in all of them instead of only in some. Great work! Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 00:27, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Give Me a Ring Sometime. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Unsure why mentioning Michael McGuire (actor) in just the infobox is sufficient enough. Why not re-duplicate his name in prose, which somebody using an IP has been reverting? George Ho ( talk) 02:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Give Me a Ring Sometime has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 17, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To Lihaas: Is citing the plot really necessary? Let's look at Avatar's plot. I wanted to discuss this in your talk page, but it needs archiving. -- George Ho ( talk) 14:42, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
As nobody has sided with the user proposing the merge, it is clear consensus at this time favors retaining the stand-alone article for this episode. Beeblebrox ( talk) 01:06, 14 October 2012 (UTC) |
There are already enough information about the pilot in Cheers (season 1). Why resurrecting it? The plot is not that impactful enough to benefit a stand-alone anymore, and reviews... image growing number of redundant reviews, good or bad. I realize that balancing the article is pointless if same information is already merged into the season article. " The Boys in the Bar" do have significant reviews enough to benefit a stand-alone, and " Coach's Daughter" may have some valuable reviews and production notes. The pilot... well, information already belongs to the season, and any other information is worthless. -- George Ho ( talk) 03:41, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Gabriel Yuji ( talk · contribs) 01:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
It looks great, but the are some issues:
Done all. -- George Ho ( talk) 00:52, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Sorry but I messed up... the plot detail was already included in the lead... I just rewrote it how it was before, but divided the paragraphs in a different way, and added a bit of proudction, which in fact wasn't included in the lead. I also broke the long "Casting" paragraph. Tell me what you think about its current state. Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 03:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm about to pass it, but first I'll do a source check. Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 04:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
I've just passed as it isn't a criteria to have the refs perfectly formatted, but I would suggest to use cite web in all of them instead of only in some. Great work! Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 00:27, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Give Me a Ring Sometime. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Unsure why mentioning Michael McGuire (actor) in just the infobox is sufficient enough. Why not re-duplicate his name in prose, which somebody using an IP has been reverting? George Ho ( talk) 02:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)