![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
Because of this record of yet another distinct meaning of GIT (the abbreviation), it should be added to the abbreviation disambiguation section. 84.140.85.246 20:48, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
I was told that git was (possibly yiddish) the word for afterbirth ,git, was as in afterbirth ,unwanted and thrown away. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.71.189 ( talk) 22:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Please discuss what you think is disputable. If you go to: http://stats.grok.se/ you will see there is no comparison. Daniel.Cardenas ( talk) 18:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
I reverted to the last good version, due to Krauss's [1] which changed good section names to bad - jumbling the dab. I restored all subsequent edits that I agreed with. Sweepy [2] lede using "G.I.T." see WP:MOSDAB "However, it is not necessary to mention minor variations of capitalization, punctuation or diacritics". An a-b sort may be worth it, but we can do any sort per MOSDAB and the git software entry may be handy at the top (per above discussion). Hope that explains as there was several edits post-corrupt sectioning. Regards Widefox; talk 08:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
User:Froid This edit [3] sorted with Places at the top, and took out the See also entry (the correct place for a WP:PTM), created several small sections against WP:MOSDAB. This ignores all the comments, so I undid it manually. I don't think readers want the village in Iran or these other places the most. Widefox; talk 11:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
I've started a discussion regarding the move of this article from it's former location here, it would be good if we could have some people who are not software developers weigh in. Artw ( talk) 19:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
when I searched for git this didn't come up. it did come up when I searched for gits. 84.71.45.82 ( talk) 21:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
Because of this record of yet another distinct meaning of GIT (the abbreviation), it should be added to the abbreviation disambiguation section. 84.140.85.246 20:48, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
I was told that git was (possibly yiddish) the word for afterbirth ,git, was as in afterbirth ,unwanted and thrown away. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.71.189 ( talk) 22:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Please discuss what you think is disputable. If you go to: http://stats.grok.se/ you will see there is no comparison. Daniel.Cardenas ( talk) 18:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
I reverted to the last good version, due to Krauss's [1] which changed good section names to bad - jumbling the dab. I restored all subsequent edits that I agreed with. Sweepy [2] lede using "G.I.T." see WP:MOSDAB "However, it is not necessary to mention minor variations of capitalization, punctuation or diacritics". An a-b sort may be worth it, but we can do any sort per MOSDAB and the git software entry may be handy at the top (per above discussion). Hope that explains as there was several edits post-corrupt sectioning. Regards Widefox; talk 08:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
User:Froid This edit [3] sorted with Places at the top, and took out the See also entry (the correct place for a WP:PTM), created several small sections against WP:MOSDAB. This ignores all the comments, so I undid it manually. I don't think readers want the village in Iran or these other places the most. Widefox; talk 11:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
I've started a discussion regarding the move of this article from it's former location here, it would be good if we could have some people who are not software developers weigh in. Artw ( talk) 19:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
when I searched for git this didn't come up. it did come up when I searched for gits. 84.71.45.82 ( talk) 21:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)