This article was nominated for deletion on 24 October 2006. The result of the discussion was delete. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion review on 3 November 2006. The result of the discussion was restored. |
What the heck does "cutpaste" mean?
I removed the WP:PROD template before I remembered to sign in. I know Wikipedia's undergone a few new standards, but I'm pretty certain this article can be edited appropriately without any trouble. I'll see if I can flag down the original author of this article so he can do something about it. I also added this to the list of articles that need work over at Wikiproject: Webcomics -- SuperHappy 04:54, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
There was a Deletion Review on this. The deletion was overturned. Let it go. -- SuperHappy 19:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
The AFD was clueless, an academic expert on comics has undeleted it as notable. It lives. - David Gerard 20:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank God. If this webcomic was not seen as notable enough for Wikipedia, I would have lost all faith in the project. There are way to many delete happy editors with their finger on the trigger.-- Pyritefoolsgold 06:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm glad to see it back too. -- Ryuko 09:24, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
A pity I missed the fun. Glad to see this restored, since it's definitely notable. It's one of those "If you don't think this is notable, you aren't qualified to edit webcomic articles anymore" ones. :) Xuanwu 07:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
And yet the article on Josh Lesnick is persistantly absent. One step at a time, I guess.... Natedubya 18:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
What qualifies MMK as a main character? Just because "every webcomic needs a cute weird non-human pet main character lol" isnt much of a reason, MMK seems much less "main" than Policeguy, for example. Yeah, I know it's listed like that on the girly page itself, and I'm just speaking from my own dislike of what seems to be the single "just like every other webcomic" element of an otherwise-unique comic, but still. Policeguy's had his own storylines, MMK doesnt even have her own color ;)
I realize this was a recent change (the deletion of the whole rest of the characters section), and while I agree the old one was too long, I'd suggest keeping everyone involved in the current "Mixed up" storyline, as the comic seems to have focused on them for a while now:
* Otra * Winter * MMK (grumble grumble) * Officer Policeguy * Chuy * the time travelling fasion scout clone secret agent whose name I can't spell * Autumn (maybe) * Fortune Teller Lady (maybe)
74.224.88.186 14:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
wendy.dreamhost.com was dead, so I replaced that text with "go-girly.com". However, I dont know if the dates were the same for that. I assume they are, since it's still dreamhost, but as for the time go-girly was registered (and wendy.dreamhost stopped working), I don't know.
On the page, it says
But I don't remember this ever being mentioned in the comic. Does anyone know where this was said? Or is this something Josh Lesnick wrote himself? Fyrius 18:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
This article is has a bit of unwarranted positivity. The Comixpedia review link is described here as "positive," but I have just read it and I would call it "critical but very forgiving." Seriously this review has many serious critiques of Girly, as well as some things the writer thinks are somewhat successful. The review comes to no particular conclusion, there is no score given. 66.41.66.213 ( talk) 05:28, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
HenryCrun15 ( talk) 06:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
An editor recently removed reference to the author's birthname (aka deadname) from this article. I think this is worth discussing and I'd like to see people's views. Here are my thoughts.
Based on all of this, when I apply MOS:DEADNAME, I consider that Jackie Lesnick was notable under her birthname and so it should be included in the article on Girly. That said, I think it should be brief; limited to a single "born" or "formerly" in the Author section of the article and used nowhere else. HenryCrun15 ( talk) 01:07, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
It's true that user TimeForJackie has edited this article once, to remove her birth name ie the name Girly was originally published under. I edited the article after that to respond to that edit. Given that TimeForJackie has only edited it once I see no need for further action, myself. HenryCrun15 ( talk) 23:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 24 October 2006. The result of the discussion was delete. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion review on 3 November 2006. The result of the discussion was restored. |
What the heck does "cutpaste" mean?
I removed the WP:PROD template before I remembered to sign in. I know Wikipedia's undergone a few new standards, but I'm pretty certain this article can be edited appropriately without any trouble. I'll see if I can flag down the original author of this article so he can do something about it. I also added this to the list of articles that need work over at Wikiproject: Webcomics -- SuperHappy 04:54, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
There was a Deletion Review on this. The deletion was overturned. Let it go. -- SuperHappy 19:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
The AFD was clueless, an academic expert on comics has undeleted it as notable. It lives. - David Gerard 20:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank God. If this webcomic was not seen as notable enough for Wikipedia, I would have lost all faith in the project. There are way to many delete happy editors with their finger on the trigger.-- Pyritefoolsgold 06:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm glad to see it back too. -- Ryuko 09:24, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
A pity I missed the fun. Glad to see this restored, since it's definitely notable. It's one of those "If you don't think this is notable, you aren't qualified to edit webcomic articles anymore" ones. :) Xuanwu 07:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
And yet the article on Josh Lesnick is persistantly absent. One step at a time, I guess.... Natedubya 18:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
What qualifies MMK as a main character? Just because "every webcomic needs a cute weird non-human pet main character lol" isnt much of a reason, MMK seems much less "main" than Policeguy, for example. Yeah, I know it's listed like that on the girly page itself, and I'm just speaking from my own dislike of what seems to be the single "just like every other webcomic" element of an otherwise-unique comic, but still. Policeguy's had his own storylines, MMK doesnt even have her own color ;)
I realize this was a recent change (the deletion of the whole rest of the characters section), and while I agree the old one was too long, I'd suggest keeping everyone involved in the current "Mixed up" storyline, as the comic seems to have focused on them for a while now:
* Otra * Winter * MMK (grumble grumble) * Officer Policeguy * Chuy * the time travelling fasion scout clone secret agent whose name I can't spell * Autumn (maybe) * Fortune Teller Lady (maybe)
74.224.88.186 14:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
wendy.dreamhost.com was dead, so I replaced that text with "go-girly.com". However, I dont know if the dates were the same for that. I assume they are, since it's still dreamhost, but as for the time go-girly was registered (and wendy.dreamhost stopped working), I don't know.
On the page, it says
But I don't remember this ever being mentioned in the comic. Does anyone know where this was said? Or is this something Josh Lesnick wrote himself? Fyrius 18:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
This article is has a bit of unwarranted positivity. The Comixpedia review link is described here as "positive," but I have just read it and I would call it "critical but very forgiving." Seriously this review has many serious critiques of Girly, as well as some things the writer thinks are somewhat successful. The review comes to no particular conclusion, there is no score given. 66.41.66.213 ( talk) 05:28, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
HenryCrun15 ( talk) 06:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
An editor recently removed reference to the author's birthname (aka deadname) from this article. I think this is worth discussing and I'd like to see people's views. Here are my thoughts.
Based on all of this, when I apply MOS:DEADNAME, I consider that Jackie Lesnick was notable under her birthname and so it should be included in the article on Girly. That said, I think it should be brief; limited to a single "born" or "formerly" in the Author section of the article and used nowhere else. HenryCrun15 ( talk) 01:07, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
It's true that user TimeForJackie has edited this article once, to remove her birth name ie the name Girly was originally published under. I edited the article after that to respond to that edit. Given that TimeForJackie has only edited it once I see no need for further action, myself. HenryCrun15 ( talk) 23:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)