![]() | Gillender Building has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article has the makings of a GA, but it needs improving first.
These comments are ordered as per their appearance in the article.
Pyrotec ( talk) 18:06, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Reluctantly, I'm failing this for the reasons given above; and that none of them have been addressed. This article has the makings of a GA. Pyrotec ( talk) 17:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Gillender Building. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:34, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Kingsif ( talk · contribs) 21:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Kingsif, and I'll be doing this review. This is an automated message that helps keep the bot updating the nominated article's talkpage working and allows me to say hi. Feel free to reach out and, if you think the review has gone well, I have some open GA nominations that you could (but are under no obligation to) look at. Kingsif ( talk) 21:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
In December 1909, The New York Times reported a new record setseems unnecessary, and is also confusing until the reader gets halfway through. Just starting "The Manhattan Trust Company..." should be good (adding the date at the end).
Demolition commenced April 29→ "commenced on"
![]() | Gillender Building has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article has the makings of a GA, but it needs improving first.
These comments are ordered as per their appearance in the article.
Pyrotec ( talk) 18:06, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Reluctantly, I'm failing this for the reasons given above; and that none of them have been addressed. This article has the makings of a GA. Pyrotec ( talk) 17:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Gillender Building. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:34, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Kingsif ( talk · contribs) 21:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Kingsif, and I'll be doing this review. This is an automated message that helps keep the bot updating the nominated article's talkpage working and allows me to say hi. Feel free to reach out and, if you think the review has gone well, I have some open GA nominations that you could (but are under no obligation to) look at. Kingsif ( talk) 21:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
In December 1909, The New York Times reported a new record setseems unnecessary, and is also confusing until the reader gets halfway through. Just starting "The Manhattan Trust Company..." should be good (adding the date at the end).
Demolition commenced April 29→ "commenced on"