From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For the record, the second VIAF reference appears to be incorrect

Leaving this here as a breadcrumb. The second VIAF reference here ( https://viaf.org/viaf/39245602/) seems to be to a different person with the same name, as the birth/death dates are different ( https://viaf.org/viaf/39245602/ is 1558-1630 and https://viaf.org/viaf/227708182/, the engraver and brother of Otto van Veen is 1562-1628. Also, all works ascribed to the engraver are listed in https://viaf.org/viaf/227708182/ and https://viaf.org/viaf/39245602/ has no works cited.

I believe I'm justified in removing the second VIAF link from Gijsbert van Veen. ZoneAlarm5 ( talk) 19:48, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For the record, the second VIAF reference appears to be incorrect

Leaving this here as a breadcrumb. The second VIAF reference here ( https://viaf.org/viaf/39245602/) seems to be to a different person with the same name, as the birth/death dates are different ( https://viaf.org/viaf/39245602/ is 1558-1630 and https://viaf.org/viaf/227708182/, the engraver and brother of Otto van Veen is 1562-1628. Also, all works ascribed to the engraver are listed in https://viaf.org/viaf/227708182/ and https://viaf.org/viaf/39245602/ has no works cited.

I believe I'm justified in removing the second VIAF link from Gijsbert van Veen. ZoneAlarm5 ( talk) 19:48, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook