![]() | GhanaSat-1 has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | GhanaSat-1 is part of the Birds-1 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
July 25, 2017. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
GhanaSat-1, the first
Ghanaian satellite in space, is used to monitor the country's coastline as well as broadcast
Ghanaian songs? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Codyorb ( talk · contribs) 21:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Commencing GA review. I'll begin the review soon. Codyorb ( talk) 21:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Codyorb ( talk) 21:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Per a discussion at Codyorb's talk page, this review is being reopened, and further work will include contributions from Mike Christie, who has agreed to give a second opinion on the state of the article, given that Codyorb is new at reviewing, and some significant issues have since come to light. BlueMoonset ( talk) 05:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
I'll copyedit as I go; please revert if I make a mess of anything.
All five satellites had to be identical to each other in the class of a 1U CubeSat: I'd suggest linking CubeSat, either here, or earlier if the revised lead mentions them (which it probably should). Also, I'm not sure what this sentence means. Do you just mean the satellites all had to be CubeSats? If so I'd rephrase; this is a complicated way of saying a simple thing.
Kees08: I'm going to pause the review here, because if some of the sources turn out not to be reliable, some rewriting might have to happen; and the same thing is true if you add more information from the newsletters or any other source. I'll go back through the article again once those points are settled. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 11:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
@ Mike Christie: I am going to ping you now on what I have done, and make sure my answers to 'are these sources reliable' are satisfactory before I continue. Thanks! Kees08 (Talk) 07:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
@ Mike Christie: I think I am ready for you to look at this again. Kees08 (Talk) 06:45, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 01:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | GhanaSat-1 has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | GhanaSat-1 is part of the Birds-1 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
July 25, 2017. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
GhanaSat-1, the first
Ghanaian satellite in space, is used to monitor the country's coastline as well as broadcast
Ghanaian songs? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Codyorb ( talk · contribs) 21:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Commencing GA review. I'll begin the review soon. Codyorb ( talk) 21:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Codyorb ( talk) 21:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Per a discussion at Codyorb's talk page, this review is being reopened, and further work will include contributions from Mike Christie, who has agreed to give a second opinion on the state of the article, given that Codyorb is new at reviewing, and some significant issues have since come to light. BlueMoonset ( talk) 05:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
I'll copyedit as I go; please revert if I make a mess of anything.
All five satellites had to be identical to each other in the class of a 1U CubeSat: I'd suggest linking CubeSat, either here, or earlier if the revised lead mentions them (which it probably should). Also, I'm not sure what this sentence means. Do you just mean the satellites all had to be CubeSats? If so I'd rephrase; this is a complicated way of saying a simple thing.
Kees08: I'm going to pause the review here, because if some of the sources turn out not to be reliable, some rewriting might have to happen; and the same thing is true if you add more information from the newsletters or any other source. I'll go back through the article again once those points are settled. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 11:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
@ Mike Christie: I am going to ping you now on what I have done, and make sure my answers to 'are these sources reliable' are satisfactory before I continue. Thanks! Kees08 (Talk) 07:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
@ Mike Christie: I think I am ready for you to look at this again. Kees08 (Talk) 06:45, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 01:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)