![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ok this article name can't be the permanent name. tortfeasor & i can't really think of a better name right now. the name translates to Bronze Seated Maitreya Statue, & in korean is usually specified by the treasure no. 78.
for now, i'm going to at least space out the words to make it more readable, but we need a better english name, please! Appleby 00:23, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
i guess the only solution is to use the treasure number in the title somehow. maybe just call it "national treasure no. 78 of south korea"? not pretty, but neither is the present title. Appleby 06:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
KJ: Sounds good. Does that mean three mountains maitreya? Any idea of No.78? And does bangasang and bangasayusang two different terms or what. Tortfeasor 04:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Pensive Bodhisattva (National Treasure No. 78) 01.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on March 23, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-03-23. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 01:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Farang! I'm a bit suprised by your notability tag in the Gilt-bronze Maitreya in Meditation (National Treasure No. 78) article. To be fair I'm not exactly sure what the standards for notability of an artwork in particular are exactly, but a quick look at, for example, [[Category:Renaissance paintings |Renaissance paintings]] with hundreds of articles for individual paintings gives me an approximate idea.
The sculpture in question is clearly a major work of korean art, referenced alredy as highlights in two major museums in two different continents, and a third party cultural organization.
My main concern is not about this article, where it is easy to find several other sources for notability, but about other articles I've worked or plan to work with, where information is more scarce.
Thanks in advance for your input and comments! Myshkin. ( talk) 07:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ok this article name can't be the permanent name. tortfeasor & i can't really think of a better name right now. the name translates to Bronze Seated Maitreya Statue, & in korean is usually specified by the treasure no. 78.
for now, i'm going to at least space out the words to make it more readable, but we need a better english name, please! Appleby 00:23, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
i guess the only solution is to use the treasure number in the title somehow. maybe just call it "national treasure no. 78 of south korea"? not pretty, but neither is the present title. Appleby 06:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
KJ: Sounds good. Does that mean three mountains maitreya? Any idea of No.78? And does bangasang and bangasayusang two different terms or what. Tortfeasor 04:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Pensive Bodhisattva (National Treasure No. 78) 01.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on March 23, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-03-23. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 01:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Farang! I'm a bit suprised by your notability tag in the Gilt-bronze Maitreya in Meditation (National Treasure No. 78) article. To be fair I'm not exactly sure what the standards for notability of an artwork in particular are exactly, but a quick look at, for example, [[Category:Renaissance paintings |Renaissance paintings]] with hundreds of articles for individual paintings gives me an approximate idea.
The sculpture in question is clearly a major work of korean art, referenced alredy as highlights in two major museums in two different continents, and a third party cultural organization.
My main concern is not about this article, where it is easy to find several other sources for notability, but about other articles I've worked or plan to work with, where information is more scarce.
Thanks in advance for your input and comments! Myshkin. ( talk) 07:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)