![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
==Untitled== hello and welcome to wikipedia hope you have fun This page is less detailed than the matching sections of London. Therefore it should either be expanded or deleted.
IMO the main problem with this (as in many similar articles) is that the term Geography has not been considered properly, so that there is so much missing. The WIKI article on Geography lists the areas as: physical geography; human geography; environmental geography; geomatics; regional geography; and related fields. This article only refers to the first, and even then only marginally. Peter Shearan 14:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
As an extension of the above remarks, and looking through the article as it stands, I have the following further comments on its factual basis:
Definitely rather thin and listy. I'll have a go at improving it. Pterre ( talk) 21:00, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Would this article be the appropriate home for a list and discussion of definitions of London? ( Greater London Area, London commuter belt, London Travel to Work Area, etc...) Omicron18 ( talk) 14:18, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Geography of London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
==Untitled== hello and welcome to wikipedia hope you have fun This page is less detailed than the matching sections of London. Therefore it should either be expanded or deleted.
IMO the main problem with this (as in many similar articles) is that the term Geography has not been considered properly, so that there is so much missing. The WIKI article on Geography lists the areas as: physical geography; human geography; environmental geography; geomatics; regional geography; and related fields. This article only refers to the first, and even then only marginally. Peter Shearan 14:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
As an extension of the above remarks, and looking through the article as it stands, I have the following further comments on its factual basis:
Definitely rather thin and listy. I'll have a go at improving it. Pterre ( talk) 21:00, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Would this article be the appropriate home for a list and discussion of definitions of London? ( Greater London Area, London commuter belt, London Travel to Work Area, etc...) Omicron18 ( talk) 14:18, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Geography of London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)