![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Gemini sources are probably fine, but is there any rule to use https source for better reachability? -- Greatder ( talk) 10:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
I'm removing the external links in the Software subsection. External links in article bodies are generally discouraged. See the external links policy page. Regards, DesertPipeline ( talk) 08:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I rather like Gemini, but on Wikipedia we have to try and be neutral. I'm afraid that when I try to look at these two articles as strictly a Wikipedia editor, I see quite a lot of things that should not be.
I don't think there should be two Gemini articles at this point. How we got to the present situation is this: there was originally a draft called "Gemini (protocol)", but it was moved into mainspace under the title "Gemini space". This decision was based on the supposition that an article called "Gemini (protocol)" could only discuss the protocol itself. Shortly afterwards, a second article was created at "Gemini (protocol)".
I propose to merge Gemini space into Gemini (protocol) because:
I must also say both articles are currently in rather poor condition. Only a small part of the material is sourced to independent reliable sources; there is a lot of original research and also opinions stated as facts (and opinions of random internet people, at that). Those three links are to Wikipedia policies.
Notifying major contributors: Brevity, Mk270, Azertus, Dexxor. Kind regards from PJvanMill) talk( 23:13, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Please give your opinion on this merge proposal below.
Merged; please feel free to undo if we should proceed differently. Brevity ( talk) 19:18, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
A graph in the article, "Size of Gemini space over time", is unclear... Does it represent the number of gemini servers? or the number of selectors/documents available on gemini? What is the source? zcrayfish ( talk) 05:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Text-only dumps of Wikipedia exist (see the 'all nopic' version here: https://wiki.kiwix.org/wiki/Content ) , so could a gemini version of Wikipedia be possible? Would be nice to browse Wikipedia from the command line. RaymondHatstand ( talk) 14:51, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
gemini://vault.transjovian.org/text/en/Gemini%20%28protocol%29
. At the same time, I should say see
WP:NOTFORUM: bear in mind that article talk pages exist solely to discuss how to improve articles; they are not for general discussion about the subject of the article. Kind regards from PJvanMill) talk( 15:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Gemini sources are probably fine, but is there any rule to use https source for better reachability? -- Greatder ( talk) 10:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
I'm removing the external links in the Software subsection. External links in article bodies are generally discouraged. See the external links policy page. Regards, DesertPipeline ( talk) 08:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I rather like Gemini, but on Wikipedia we have to try and be neutral. I'm afraid that when I try to look at these two articles as strictly a Wikipedia editor, I see quite a lot of things that should not be.
I don't think there should be two Gemini articles at this point. How we got to the present situation is this: there was originally a draft called "Gemini (protocol)", but it was moved into mainspace under the title "Gemini space". This decision was based on the supposition that an article called "Gemini (protocol)" could only discuss the protocol itself. Shortly afterwards, a second article was created at "Gemini (protocol)".
I propose to merge Gemini space into Gemini (protocol) because:
I must also say both articles are currently in rather poor condition. Only a small part of the material is sourced to independent reliable sources; there is a lot of original research and also opinions stated as facts (and opinions of random internet people, at that). Those three links are to Wikipedia policies.
Notifying major contributors: Brevity, Mk270, Azertus, Dexxor. Kind regards from PJvanMill) talk( 23:13, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Please give your opinion on this merge proposal below.
Merged; please feel free to undo if we should proceed differently. Brevity ( talk) 19:18, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
A graph in the article, "Size of Gemini space over time", is unclear... Does it represent the number of gemini servers? or the number of selectors/documents available on gemini? What is the source? zcrayfish ( talk) 05:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Text-only dumps of Wikipedia exist (see the 'all nopic' version here: https://wiki.kiwix.org/wiki/Content ) , so could a gemini version of Wikipedia be possible? Would be nice to browse Wikipedia from the command line. RaymondHatstand ( talk) 14:51, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
gemini://vault.transjovian.org/text/en/Gemini%20%28protocol%29
. At the same time, I should say see
WP:NOTFORUM: bear in mind that article talk pages exist solely to discuss how to improve articles; they are not for general discussion about the subject of the article. Kind regards from PJvanMill) talk( 15:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)