This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Concern has been raised that this article contains content and references which relate to another vessel. As a result, one editor has repeatedly blanked very significant amounts of content that they feel is not correct for this page. Although I suspect they may well have a very good point, I have asked them not to repeat this action as we are now getting into edit-warring territory, but for all editors of this article to discuss the evidence and come to a consensus over possible confusion. This is not my area of expertise, but I have found this link to Naeraberg (aka Dirk Diederik) and this link to Dirk Dirk (aka Naeraberg) which, by their sizes and ages are clearly different sized and aged vessels.
By reinstating all of the disputed/blanked content for now (which would otherwise have left a virtually blank article), I trust all editors will look at that content and sort out any possible confusion between themselves in a constructive way. Pinging @ JarrahTree and Longhair: as the two most involved editors in building this page. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes ( talk) 02:41, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
The content of the article has to match at of the title, or the article is worthless, if there is very little info left after removal of the Dirk Dirk info, so what? at least its factually correct info. Otherwise what? perhaps someone would like to contribute to the article by grafting in a section on the QE2, they are both ships after all! "I trust all editors will look at that content and sort out any possible confusion between themselves in a constructive way." I don't see any confusion, I see factually incorrect info added to an article it does not belong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.187.172.208 ( talk) 11:40, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
I've reverted content to 828195093 as the changes made beyond this point to a C-Class assess article and placing (incorrectly) to Afd were disruptive. The article content quite appropriately remains in dispute. I welcome ongoing 'sourced' discussion on this page to achieve concensus and to help determine the truth of the matter. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 22:25, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
As the ship's notability is dominated so far by the events in Australia, I think that the article should be moved to Geelong Star, which is a current redirect here. Davidships ( talk) 00:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Can 31.90.221.70 and 31.80.122.141 (and anyone else) please discuss this here and not directly edit the article. Not doing this will be regarded as a disruptive edit. Thankyou. 17:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Concern has been raised that this article contains content and references which relate to another vessel. As a result, one editor has repeatedly blanked very significant amounts of content that they feel is not correct for this page. Although I suspect they may well have a very good point, I have asked them not to repeat this action as we are now getting into edit-warring territory, but for all editors of this article to discuss the evidence and come to a consensus over possible confusion. This is not my area of expertise, but I have found this link to Naeraberg (aka Dirk Diederik) and this link to Dirk Dirk (aka Naeraberg) which, by their sizes and ages are clearly different sized and aged vessels.
By reinstating all of the disputed/blanked content for now (which would otherwise have left a virtually blank article), I trust all editors will look at that content and sort out any possible confusion between themselves in a constructive way. Pinging @ JarrahTree and Longhair: as the two most involved editors in building this page. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes ( talk) 02:41, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
The content of the article has to match at of the title, or the article is worthless, if there is very little info left after removal of the Dirk Dirk info, so what? at least its factually correct info. Otherwise what? perhaps someone would like to contribute to the article by grafting in a section on the QE2, they are both ships after all! "I trust all editors will look at that content and sort out any possible confusion between themselves in a constructive way." I don't see any confusion, I see factually incorrect info added to an article it does not belong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.187.172.208 ( talk) 11:40, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
I've reverted content to 828195093 as the changes made beyond this point to a C-Class assess article and placing (incorrectly) to Afd were disruptive. The article content quite appropriately remains in dispute. I welcome ongoing 'sourced' discussion on this page to achieve concensus and to help determine the truth of the matter. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 22:25, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
As the ship's notability is dominated so far by the events in Australia, I think that the article should be moved to Geelong Star, which is a current redirect here. Davidships ( talk) 00:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Can 31.90.221.70 and 31.80.122.141 (and anyone else) please discuss this here and not directly edit the article. Not doing this will be regarded as a disruptive edit. Thankyou. 17:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC)