This article was nominated for deletion on 28 February 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I came across this stub from exorcism, and the line "LGBT rights groups believe this to be a common occurrence," which links to two offline sources, seems quite editorial, not to mention impossible to ascribe to an entire rights movement. I'm deleting it. If it must be put back, I recommend the addition of the word "some," or a reworking of the sentence. 98.219.192.79 ( talk) 20:55, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Incredibly biased, seemingly created by a homophobe, and could be included in the general page on homophobia; should it be PROD'd? [ dotKuro ] [ talk ] [ contribs ] 18:00, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gay exorcism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 28 February 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I came across this stub from exorcism, and the line "LGBT rights groups believe this to be a common occurrence," which links to two offline sources, seems quite editorial, not to mention impossible to ascribe to an entire rights movement. I'm deleting it. If it must be put back, I recommend the addition of the word "some," or a reworking of the sentence. 98.219.192.79 ( talk) 20:55, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Incredibly biased, seemingly created by a homophobe, and could be included in the general page on homophobia; should it be PROD'd? [ dotKuro ] [ talk ] [ contribs ] 18:00, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gay exorcism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)