This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Godzilla, Mothra and King Ghidorah: Giant Monsters All-Out Attack is the only page in the "Outgoing Pageviews" section on the
WikiNav page meaning that it appears to indefinitely be the primary topic (to me).
Eiga-Kevin2 (
talk)
11:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC)reply
It just means that it was the only topic that gathered a combination of input and output clicks that is over 10 in volume and can be rendered. Even if we actually thought that no other links were ever clicked on the list, none at all, the overall ratio is still very small. This could mean that people are looking for some other undocumented GMK meaning and not finding it. It could also mean that they're content seeing just the list. For a topic to be primary, it needs to be sought more often than everything else, and there is no evidence here for that. --
Joy (
talk)
06:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Unlikely to be the primary topic with respect, given the large number of meanings and the relatively rare use as an abbreviation for the film title. As for the Wikinav data: the link to the film got 16 clicks, which is more than any other link present on the dab page at the time (it has since been expanded), but significantly less than the total views of the dab (links with fewer than 10 clicks don't make it into the dataset). –
Uanfala (
talk)
11:40, 21 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Godzilla, Mothra and King Ghidorah: Giant Monsters All-Out Attack is the only page in the "Outgoing Pageviews" section on the
WikiNav page meaning that it appears to indefinitely be the primary topic (to me).
Eiga-Kevin2 (
talk)
11:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC)reply
It just means that it was the only topic that gathered a combination of input and output clicks that is over 10 in volume and can be rendered. Even if we actually thought that no other links were ever clicked on the list, none at all, the overall ratio is still very small. This could mean that people are looking for some other undocumented GMK meaning and not finding it. It could also mean that they're content seeing just the list. For a topic to be primary, it needs to be sought more often than everything else, and there is no evidence here for that. --
Joy (
talk)
06:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Unlikely to be the primary topic with respect, given the large number of meanings and the relatively rare use as an abbreviation for the film title. As for the Wikinav data: the link to the film got 16 clicks, which is more than any other link present on the dab page at the time (it has since been expanded), but significantly less than the total views of the dab (links with fewer than 10 clicks don't make it into the dataset). –
Uanfala (
talk)
11:40, 21 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.