This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
GLAM (cultural heritage) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 November 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
Heh, I thought Liam Wyatt had actually invented the term! Can its precise invention be nailed any better? - David Gerard ( talk) 15:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
The 2003 Australian event is confirmed. here is an April 2003 use, again Australian. 2008 Australian newsletter. 2007 Kiwi council agenda. Is there instances of the acronym in common use in other counties? John Vandenberg ( chat) 21:58, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
I just ran into this use on Wikipedia in April 2009 about an Australian organisation, which was just before the wmau:GLAM-WIKI page was created in May 2009. John Vandenberg ( chat) 00:12, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
The article uses the WMUK wiki as a source for their GLAM-WIKI 2010. We really should have an independent source to demonstrate notability. I've quickly looked, and I can only see blogs about it, but even they dont appear to be independent sources. e.g. even http://blogs.loc.gov/digitalpreservation/2012/04/galleries-libraries-archives-museums-with-wikipedia-glam-wiki-insights-interview-with-lori-phillip/ is an interview with a GLAM-WIKI person. Is there any WP:RS for this event? John Vandenberg ( chat) 02:09, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
I am very disappointed by this addition on 1 April 2012 to the GLAM (industry sector) article, which is advertising for a WMUK event. It is inappropriate to add "planned" events per WP:CRYSTAL, especially if you don't use reliable sources that are independent, _especially_ when you have a conflict of interest ( user:Johnbod was announced as a WMUK trustee nominee four days after that edit, and became a WMUK trustee a month later). I checked and couldn't find any online newspaper articles for "GLAM-WIKI 2012" or "GLAM-WIKI 2013", so I have removed this. John Vandenberg ( chat) 03:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
The term GLAM might already have been used mid eighties previous century within the sector itself. Citation needed of course. Ad Huikeshoven ( talk) 11:03, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
The page is currently disambiguated using "industry", which makes no sense in this context. "Industry" is "the automated production of material goods". This page needs to be moved to a more appropriate title. Thanks, DesertPipeline ( talk) 13:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
In macroeconomics, an industry is a branch of an economy that produces a closely related set of raw materials, goods, or services. [1] For example, one might refer to the wood industry or the insurance industry.
- neither of these examples are "the automated production of material goods". But the GLAM sector falls down on "production", being more about conservation & display. Plus it isn't often called an "industry" - more usually a "sector", I'd say.
References
Johnbod ( talk) 15:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
The following Creative Commons policy paper could be of use. [1] It covers the reform of the copyright law to allow better use of collections in a digital age. And has a half page on AI trained on GLAM materials and some of the issues that presents. Perhaps someone could working this material in? RobbieIanMorrison ( talk) 22:55, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
References
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
GLAM (cultural heritage) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 November 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
Heh, I thought Liam Wyatt had actually invented the term! Can its precise invention be nailed any better? - David Gerard ( talk) 15:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
The 2003 Australian event is confirmed. here is an April 2003 use, again Australian. 2008 Australian newsletter. 2007 Kiwi council agenda. Is there instances of the acronym in common use in other counties? John Vandenberg ( chat) 21:58, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
I just ran into this use on Wikipedia in April 2009 about an Australian organisation, which was just before the wmau:GLAM-WIKI page was created in May 2009. John Vandenberg ( chat) 00:12, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
The article uses the WMUK wiki as a source for their GLAM-WIKI 2010. We really should have an independent source to demonstrate notability. I've quickly looked, and I can only see blogs about it, but even they dont appear to be independent sources. e.g. even http://blogs.loc.gov/digitalpreservation/2012/04/galleries-libraries-archives-museums-with-wikipedia-glam-wiki-insights-interview-with-lori-phillip/ is an interview with a GLAM-WIKI person. Is there any WP:RS for this event? John Vandenberg ( chat) 02:09, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
I am very disappointed by this addition on 1 April 2012 to the GLAM (industry sector) article, which is advertising for a WMUK event. It is inappropriate to add "planned" events per WP:CRYSTAL, especially if you don't use reliable sources that are independent, _especially_ when you have a conflict of interest ( user:Johnbod was announced as a WMUK trustee nominee four days after that edit, and became a WMUK trustee a month later). I checked and couldn't find any online newspaper articles for "GLAM-WIKI 2012" or "GLAM-WIKI 2013", so I have removed this. John Vandenberg ( chat) 03:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
The term GLAM might already have been used mid eighties previous century within the sector itself. Citation needed of course. Ad Huikeshoven ( talk) 11:03, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
The page is currently disambiguated using "industry", which makes no sense in this context. "Industry" is "the automated production of material goods". This page needs to be moved to a more appropriate title. Thanks, DesertPipeline ( talk) 13:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
In macroeconomics, an industry is a branch of an economy that produces a closely related set of raw materials, goods, or services. [1] For example, one might refer to the wood industry or the insurance industry.
- neither of these examples are "the automated production of material goods". But the GLAM sector falls down on "production", being more about conservation & display. Plus it isn't often called an "industry" - more usually a "sector", I'd say.
References
Johnbod ( talk) 15:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
The following Creative Commons policy paper could be of use. [1] It covers the reform of the copyright law to allow better use of collections in a digital age. And has a half page on AI trained on GLAM materials and some of the issues that presents. Perhaps someone could working this material in? RobbieIanMorrison ( talk) 22:55, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
References