This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
G1 Aviation G1 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Got two different values here, 14.80 and 14.27 m², seemingly from the same ref. Also (marginal,rounding error) differences in the Rotax hp. I did not change them, not having the source, but think they should agree. Given 75 kW, I could make rounding arguments for either 100 or 101 hp, but the area difference is significant. TSRL ( talk) 20:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, the comment that zenith made is false. I am the official G1 America representative and our G1 is not a Zenith copy! (it is a originally based on the Yuma design in Italy...) This may be critical for our market and we strongly advice you to remove this comment! Or you leave us the chance to explain why it is not a copy! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.255.113.12 ( talk) 16:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
G1 Aviation G1 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Got two different values here, 14.80 and 14.27 m², seemingly from the same ref. Also (marginal,rounding error) differences in the Rotax hp. I did not change them, not having the source, but think they should agree. Given 75 kW, I could make rounding arguments for either 100 or 101 hp, but the area difference is significant. TSRL ( talk) 20:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, the comment that zenith made is false. I am the official G1 America representative and our G1 is not a Zenith copy! (it is a originally based on the Yuma design in Italy...) This may be critical for our market and we strongly advice you to remove this comment! Or you leave us the chance to explain why it is not a copy! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.255.113.12 ( talk) 16:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)