 | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 February 2018. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
 | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Ra.One Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Ra.One |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Withdrawn. Vegaswikian ( talk) 07:26, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
G.One (character) → G.One – Per WP:Precision. No other Wikipedia article with the name G.One, so the term (character) is redundant. Feel free to discuss, thanks! Yours faithfully, Kotak kasut. 04:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose "G.One" should redirect to the disambiguation page G1, since several of those terms are also spelt "g.one", "g-one", "g one", and "G-I", "G I", "G.I" depending on who writes it. 76.65.128.198 ( talk) 06:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. Yet another ill-advised and legalistic application of naming principles, to remove an obviously useful indication of the topic. Can we stop this sort of thing, please? Noetica Tea? 02:24, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose - Let the title be specific about the article firstly. -- Karthik Nadar ( talk) 12:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for the comment guys, I'm convinced this might not be a good idea now. xD Yours faithfully, Kotak kasut. 16:38, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 24 February 2018. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
|
| This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Ra.One Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Ra.One |
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Withdrawn. Vegaswikian ( talk) 07:26, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
G.One (character) → G.One – Per WP:Precision. No other Wikipedia article with the name G.One, so the term (character) is redundant. Feel free to discuss, thanks! Yours faithfully, Kotak kasut. 04:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose "G.One" should redirect to the disambiguation page G1, since several of those terms are also spelt "g.one", "g-one", "g one", and "G-I", "G I", "G.I" depending on who writes it. 76.65.128.198 ( talk) 06:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. Yet another ill-advised and legalistic application of naming principles, to remove an obviously useful indication of the topic. Can we stop this sort of thing, please? Noetica Tea? 02:24, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose - Let the title be specific about the article firstly. -- Karthik Nadar ( talk) 12:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for the comment guys, I'm convinced this might not be a good idea now. xD Yours faithfully, Kotak kasut. 16:38, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.