This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
I, Trupesh Patel, will be working on expanding this stub until the end of December 2013 as part of my undergraduate class project for Neuroscience at Georgia Tech. Tpatel45 ( talk) 21:22, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
1. Quality of Information: 1
2. Article size: 0
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 1
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting: 1
8. Writing: 1
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?: 1
Total: 13 out of 20
Comments: The article size is too small and a lot more information needs to be added. The references sections needs to be updated as well. With a lot more detail, the article will be a informative read.
SindhujaPadmanabhan ( talk) 15:23, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback and suggestions. Tpatel45 ( talk) 21:56, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Dershika Patel ( talk) 17:19, 25 November 2013 (UTC)== Wiki Article Peer Review for BMED 4752: Neurosceince ==
1. Quality of Information: 0
2. Article size:0 (The article was of inadequate length)
3. Readability: 1
4. Refs: 1 (only 5 citations existed on November 19)
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 1
7. Formatting:1
8. Writing: 1 (There are many incidences where words such as "the", "a", etc. are missing and makes it difficult to read)
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?:0 _______________ Total: 9 out of 20
Comments: This article does not meet most of the requirements that were stated by the rubric for the assignment. The article contains a very limited amount of information and requires more research to be performed to create an adequate article. It also appears to not have even a lengthier outline to help support the article. Dershika Patel ( talk) 17:19, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback. Tpatel45 ( talk) 21:59, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
1. Quality of Information: 1
2. Article size: 0
3. Readability: 1
4. Refs: 1
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting: 1
8. Writing: 1
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?:0
Total: 11 out of 20 Peer Reviewed by: Saswat SaswatPanda ( talk) 22:14, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. I will keep that in mind. I have expanded some sections and added an image. Tpatel45 ( talk) 22:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for writing an extra chapter about a simple typing error - I think that the word "lability" is meant, but it could also be "liability", so I didn't correct it because I don't want to correct it by the wrong word... -- 79.243.228.202 ( talk) 17:29, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. I corrected the word.-- Tpatel45 ( talk) 01:44, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Excoriation disorder cites laterality in the neurological causes of the disorder. This aspect is not cited within this page. Anacforcelli ( talk) 02:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
I, Trupesh Patel, will be working on expanding this stub until the end of December 2013 as part of my undergraduate class project for Neuroscience at Georgia Tech. Tpatel45 ( talk) 21:22, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
1. Quality of Information: 1
2. Article size: 0
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 1
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting: 1
8. Writing: 1
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?: 1
Total: 13 out of 20
Comments: The article size is too small and a lot more information needs to be added. The references sections needs to be updated as well. With a lot more detail, the article will be a informative read.
SindhujaPadmanabhan ( talk) 15:23, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback and suggestions. Tpatel45 ( talk) 21:56, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Dershika Patel ( talk) 17:19, 25 November 2013 (UTC)== Wiki Article Peer Review for BMED 4752: Neurosceince ==
1. Quality of Information: 0
2. Article size:0 (The article was of inadequate length)
3. Readability: 1
4. Refs: 1 (only 5 citations existed on November 19)
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 1
7. Formatting:1
8. Writing: 1 (There are many incidences where words such as "the", "a", etc. are missing and makes it difficult to read)
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?:0 _______________ Total: 9 out of 20
Comments: This article does not meet most of the requirements that were stated by the rubric for the assignment. The article contains a very limited amount of information and requires more research to be performed to create an adequate article. It also appears to not have even a lengthier outline to help support the article. Dershika Patel ( talk) 17:19, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback. Tpatel45 ( talk) 21:59, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
1. Quality of Information: 1
2. Article size: 0
3. Readability: 1
4. Refs: 1
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting: 1
8. Writing: 1
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?:0
Total: 11 out of 20 Peer Reviewed by: Saswat SaswatPanda ( talk) 22:14, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. I will keep that in mind. I have expanded some sections and added an image. Tpatel45 ( talk) 22:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for writing an extra chapter about a simple typing error - I think that the word "lability" is meant, but it could also be "liability", so I didn't correct it because I don't want to correct it by the wrong word... -- 79.243.228.202 ( talk) 17:29, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. I corrected the word.-- Tpatel45 ( talk) 01:44, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Excoriation disorder cites laterality in the neurological causes of the disorder. This aspect is not cited within this page. Anacforcelli ( talk) 02:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)