![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Zoemorin,
Wendyma.team8.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 21:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This article has several areas it's pretty obvious it was written by someone with only a working level of English, especially the portions regarding its status in Islam under "Religious" and under the Indonesia section, suggesting that it's probably written by someone from Indonesia. Many grammatical errors, odd usage of articles, singulars and plurals, as well as awkward word choice and other issues make it really unclear and difficult to read. If someone has any knowledge of this area and the time and interest it really does need a bit of work, and I think it's worth it since I didn't actually know anything about frog leg consumption in Indonesia, which seems to be very commonplace. It's also NPOV as in several areas there is reference to it being "disgusting," which is inherently NPOV without any kind of significance behind it (for instance, religious canonical terminology). MJXcess ( talk) 18:59, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Untitled Frogs' are not related to chickens, much less lobsters. Frogs are amphibians, chickens are birds, and lobsters are anthropods. Frogs are as closely related to chickens as either is related tuna, and as related to lobster as each is related to an earthworm (actually, an earthworm has more in common with a lobster than with a frog). I'm going to remove that line now. Gentgeen 21:42, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
This is gross. Maybe someone should delete this page? 83.31.217.182 03:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, it's a common statement but frogs don't taste like chicken. SchmuckyTheCat 00:09, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
ummmm,i haven't eaten frog before but i think they don't taste like chicken(for a random reason,dont ask me why). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.14.32.117 ( talk) 11:15, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
I've eaten whole frogs in the Dome. How widespread is that in France? JeffBurdges 17:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC My french teacher who is actually french told me that they taste like chicken
Should there not be a section in this article devoted to Volta and Galvani and the phenomenon of electric current in a frog's leg? ( Herbert Dingle 15:11, 5 October 2007 (UTC)).
Why are only upper leg sections eaten? Is the rest not palatable? Please add info. -- 92.229.143.190 ( talk) 01:02, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
According to [1] [2] [3] the English had ate them first, so does this really mean that all them years ago the English were eating them as the French do now as a type of food in one's diet?-- Windows66 ( talk) 12:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
No the article(s) implies that Ancient Britons ate them, not the English who came over 7000 years later from Germany. Some Celts later settled in Brittany, France. Sam 03:47, 20 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samx ( talk • contribs)
Why there is such meat called "frog legs"?
It does not fit in with beef: ( hamburger, steak, etc.), poultry: ( chicken, turkey, etc.), pork: ( ham, bacon, etc.), seafood: ( fish, salmon, shrimp, tuna, etc.) or even with lamb.
Who made the creation of "frog legs"?
Why are frog legs are from France, Portugal, Brazil, Slovenia, Croatia, Mexico, Greece, and etc.? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.244.206.55 ( talk) 10:59, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
The preparation of frog legs is done on living animals. There is no way doing that ethically without killing them first. First the head is cut off with a scissor, then the front legs are cut off, and then the lower part of the body is cut. Sometimes they are put in icy water first to "paralyse" them although that has nothing to do anesthesia in the clinical sense of the word. Even chopping off the head does not impede the organism to be alive for up to 15 minutes. 83.86.75.220 ( talk) 16:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Zoemorin,
Wendyma.team8.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 21:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This article has several areas it's pretty obvious it was written by someone with only a working level of English, especially the portions regarding its status in Islam under "Religious" and under the Indonesia section, suggesting that it's probably written by someone from Indonesia. Many grammatical errors, odd usage of articles, singulars and plurals, as well as awkward word choice and other issues make it really unclear and difficult to read. If someone has any knowledge of this area and the time and interest it really does need a bit of work, and I think it's worth it since I didn't actually know anything about frog leg consumption in Indonesia, which seems to be very commonplace. It's also NPOV as in several areas there is reference to it being "disgusting," which is inherently NPOV without any kind of significance behind it (for instance, religious canonical terminology). MJXcess ( talk) 18:59, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Untitled Frogs' are not related to chickens, much less lobsters. Frogs are amphibians, chickens are birds, and lobsters are anthropods. Frogs are as closely related to chickens as either is related tuna, and as related to lobster as each is related to an earthworm (actually, an earthworm has more in common with a lobster than with a frog). I'm going to remove that line now. Gentgeen 21:42, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
This is gross. Maybe someone should delete this page? 83.31.217.182 03:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, it's a common statement but frogs don't taste like chicken. SchmuckyTheCat 00:09, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
ummmm,i haven't eaten frog before but i think they don't taste like chicken(for a random reason,dont ask me why). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.14.32.117 ( talk) 11:15, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
I've eaten whole frogs in the Dome. How widespread is that in France? JeffBurdges 17:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC My french teacher who is actually french told me that they taste like chicken
Should there not be a section in this article devoted to Volta and Galvani and the phenomenon of electric current in a frog's leg? ( Herbert Dingle 15:11, 5 October 2007 (UTC)).
Why are only upper leg sections eaten? Is the rest not palatable? Please add info. -- 92.229.143.190 ( talk) 01:02, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
According to [1] [2] [3] the English had ate them first, so does this really mean that all them years ago the English were eating them as the French do now as a type of food in one's diet?-- Windows66 ( talk) 12:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
No the article(s) implies that Ancient Britons ate them, not the English who came over 7000 years later from Germany. Some Celts later settled in Brittany, France. Sam 03:47, 20 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samx ( talk • contribs)
Why there is such meat called "frog legs"?
It does not fit in with beef: ( hamburger, steak, etc.), poultry: ( chicken, turkey, etc.), pork: ( ham, bacon, etc.), seafood: ( fish, salmon, shrimp, tuna, etc.) or even with lamb.
Who made the creation of "frog legs"?
Why are frog legs are from France, Portugal, Brazil, Slovenia, Croatia, Mexico, Greece, and etc.? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.244.206.55 ( talk) 10:59, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
The preparation of frog legs is done on living animals. There is no way doing that ethically without killing them first. First the head is cut off with a scissor, then the front legs are cut off, and then the lower part of the body is cut. Sometimes they are put in icy water first to "paralyse" them although that has nothing to do anesthesia in the clinical sense of the word. Even chopping off the head does not impede the organism to be alive for up to 15 minutes. 83.86.75.220 ( talk) 16:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)