![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
SPIDER deserves it's own page and is not a FROG technique. -- Erik Zeek 20:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
The diagram is of a multishot SHG FROG, not a single-shot FROG. Erik Zeek 17:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
I started the page on GRENOUILLE. It will take some time, but it is at least started. Patrick Berry 19:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Please stop changing the diagram caption from multi-shot to single-shot. It is obviously not single shot because it depicts an autocorrelator section. Patrick Berry 02:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Anyone want to write up the 'magic step'? I have moved it into the comments for now. --
Chuck Sirloin
17:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Rick thought that the FROG page needed updating. He wrote a new version, which I have used to replace the current page. Please feel free to discuss this new version of the FROG entry. -- Peter M Vaughan, Department of Physics, Gerogia Tech ( talk) 17:36, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
In the 1st equation of the section "FROG", there is a variable S_sig(t,\tau). Should that be an E_sig(t,\tau)?
--
User:Xfig —Preceding
undated comment added
18:03, 14 June 2010 (UTC).
Yes, this should have read E_sig. Thank you.-- Peter M Vaughan, Department of Physics, Gerogia Tech —Preceding undated comment added 20:45, 20 January 2011 (UTC).
I'm no expert on FROG but the controversy section is a mess, shouldn't it be removed?! Dstuck ( talk) 20:40, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Currently in the process of rewriting large sections of the FROG page MichelleAld ( talk) 17:25, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
SPIDER deserves it's own page and is not a FROG technique. -- Erik Zeek 20:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
The diagram is of a multishot SHG FROG, not a single-shot FROG. Erik Zeek 17:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
I started the page on GRENOUILLE. It will take some time, but it is at least started. Patrick Berry 19:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Please stop changing the diagram caption from multi-shot to single-shot. It is obviously not single shot because it depicts an autocorrelator section. Patrick Berry 02:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Anyone want to write up the 'magic step'? I have moved it into the comments for now. --
Chuck Sirloin
17:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Rick thought that the FROG page needed updating. He wrote a new version, which I have used to replace the current page. Please feel free to discuss this new version of the FROG entry. -- Peter M Vaughan, Department of Physics, Gerogia Tech ( talk) 17:36, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
In the 1st equation of the section "FROG", there is a variable S_sig(t,\tau). Should that be an E_sig(t,\tau)?
--
User:Xfig —Preceding
undated comment added
18:03, 14 June 2010 (UTC).
Yes, this should have read E_sig. Thank you.-- Peter M Vaughan, Department of Physics, Gerogia Tech —Preceding undated comment added 20:45, 20 January 2011 (UTC).
I'm no expert on FROG but the controversy section is a mess, shouldn't it be removed?! Dstuck ( talk) 20:40, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Currently in the process of rewriting large sections of the FROG page MichelleAld ( talk) 17:25, 6 June 2012 (UTC)