This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article needs additional citations for
verification. (March 2008) |
This article reads more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia article e.g. in the first sentence the word "palatable" jumps off the page - a subjective judgement, surely? Also there are no references to external 3rd party sources. IMO this article is a candidate for deletion - if I could remember how, I'd tag it as such! Perhaps someone else can help. Thanks. -- TraceyR ( talk) 21:07, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
I have removed this article from WikiProject Pharmacology. "Nutritional supplements" != "Pharmaceuticals". Dr. Cash ( talk) 21:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
The article (and the company literature, from which much of it has been copied) state that "Fortisip is suitable for use as the sole source of nutrition (my emphasis) for most people over 6 years of age." I have raised the need for citation(s) supporting this statement, but is there any way in which this could be true? The company presumably takes legal advice about the claims it makes for the product, but it sounds way over the top to me. It could even be seen as dangerous advice for the general public and might cause Wikipedia problems - just imagine what would happen if comeone took this seriously. Any comments? -- TraceyR ( talk) 11:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
More like Frostipis, am I right? Hahahahaha -- 89.127.175.172 ( talk) 00:24, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
1. is it for general sale or prescription-only? 2. as the label of the actual bottle (of which I have a few in my posession) claims/warns it contains "milk proteins", what are these if not lactose? 77.102.101.220 ( talk) 22:22, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
The advertisement ("article") makes extraordinary claims, with no evidence at all supporting these claims. Where are the peer-reviewed papers published in a relevant science journal that suggests this malnutrition supplement has any kine of efficacy? Desertphile ( talk) 20:29, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article needs additional citations for
verification. (March 2008) |
This article reads more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia article e.g. in the first sentence the word "palatable" jumps off the page - a subjective judgement, surely? Also there are no references to external 3rd party sources. IMO this article is a candidate for deletion - if I could remember how, I'd tag it as such! Perhaps someone else can help. Thanks. -- TraceyR ( talk) 21:07, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
I have removed this article from WikiProject Pharmacology. "Nutritional supplements" != "Pharmaceuticals". Dr. Cash ( talk) 21:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
The article (and the company literature, from which much of it has been copied) state that "Fortisip is suitable for use as the sole source of nutrition (my emphasis) for most people over 6 years of age." I have raised the need for citation(s) supporting this statement, but is there any way in which this could be true? The company presumably takes legal advice about the claims it makes for the product, but it sounds way over the top to me. It could even be seen as dangerous advice for the general public and might cause Wikipedia problems - just imagine what would happen if comeone took this seriously. Any comments? -- TraceyR ( talk) 11:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
More like Frostipis, am I right? Hahahahaha -- 89.127.175.172 ( talk) 00:24, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
1. is it for general sale or prescription-only? 2. as the label of the actual bottle (of which I have a few in my posession) claims/warns it contains "milk proteins", what are these if not lactose? 77.102.101.220 ( talk) 22:22, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
The advertisement ("article") makes extraordinary claims, with no evidence at all supporting these claims. Where are the peer-reviewed papers published in a relevant science journal that suggests this malnutrition supplement has any kine of efficacy? Desertphile ( talk) 20:29, 24 May 2023 (UTC)