This article was nominated for deletion on 22 October 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Chinese This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force. Hong Kong: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Hong Kong Cinema (assessed as Low-importance). Hong Kong To-do: history watch purge Attention needed (60) ...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (25) Collaboration needed Recommend topic Improvement needed GA-Class articles (59) • B-Class articles (286) Cleanup needed C-Class articles (1,000) Image needed (347) Destub needed Start-Class articles (5,365) • Stub-Class articles (6,711) Deorphan needed ...orphans Page creation needed Requested articles Miscellaneous tasks ...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (405) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,290)

Since when a film has to be "major" and "successful" to be considered encyclopedia worthy?

Promational puffery by a major contributor who stars the remake??? What are you talking about??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim12chang ( talk • contribs) at 09:47, 21 October 2008

That would be you, Mr. Chang.

As for standards, yes, there are some, since Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a directory. -- CalendarWatcher ( talk) 13:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

I am THAT Tim Chang?? Ha ha ha!!! That is the funniest thing I've ever heard!! Well, thank you very much. Such a compliment! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim12chang ( talk • contribs) 20:18, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Given that he's a failed and apparently marginally talented actor, I'm not sure why you'd be flattered by the comparison. -- CalendarWatcher ( talk) 05:19, 25 October 2008 (UTC) reply

The DVD cover image belongs to an unrelated 1968 movie which has the same English name but a different Chinese name ( zh:金石情). I had removed the image from the article. -- Joshua ^{Say "hi" to me!} _{What I've done?} 10:13, 4 April 2010 (UTC) reply