![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Oman and Guinea Bissau have withdrawn their decisions to recognize Kosovo’s independence
http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2011&mm=09&dd=08&nav_id=76291 77.105.49.83 ( talk) 13:47, 8 September 2011 (UTC) Nothing was withdrawn. 2003:DB:6738:901:BDA5:C013:8471:1C5 ( talk) 19:15, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was no consensus to merge. The merge proposal was rejected. Bring up new proposals in light of the below comments. -- Yellowdesk ( talk) 00:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
PROPOSAL
Please There is no point in having two articles and there is not enough content to justify a split. -
Justin (koavf)·
T·
C·
M
23:32, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
IceDragon64 ( talk) 00:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Could we not have straw polls at two places at the same time? — Kurykh 00:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
The two articles should never be merged because the article International reaction to the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence in future will remain as a historical document to the response of Kosovo Independence. The foreign relation article will not be able to document the international facts in details. So the two articles should never be merged. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 17:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
When Montenegro became independent, all the recognitions and establishments of diplomatic relations and embassies were noted in foreign relations of Montenegro; I see no reason why the article foreign relations of Kosovo can't serve in the same way. — Nightstallion 17:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Maybe It seems like the consensus is to merge in a little while, so I guess a week or so? - Justin (koavf)· T· C· M 02:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
The articles should not be merged. Kosovo is not legally a state under UNSCR 1244 and under Chapter 1, Article 2 of the UN Charter, therefore it cannot have foreign relations. Kosovo's foreign relations are legitimately dealt with by the government of Serbia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FergusM1970 ( talk • contribs) 23:49, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Kosovo is a state as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Therefore this article should stay and continue to develop. Jawohl ( talk) 11:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Since when is B.Clinton Ambassador of Saudi Arabia in Prishtina? Jawohl ( talk) 15:24, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
I am new around and would like to know who did it. They also put Mother Teresa as ambassador in Slovenia!!! Jawohl ( talk) 16:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
I posted this at the "International Reaction" page but they weren't too charitable... just wondering whether its worth mentioning that for the first time there will be a Miss Kosovo competing at Miss Universe 2008. The pageant is being held in Vietnam and the Vietnamese government initially would not give her a visa to compete... she eventually travelled on an Albanian passport although apparantly the officials weren't thrilled about that situation either. And please don't dismiss Miss Universe as fluff, its been around for nearly sixty years and as far as I am aware this is one of the first major international competitions that will have a Kosovan representative. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 00:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
This is a particularly relevant foreign relations issue that should be included in the article. I'm just putting the idea out there and will not actually bother with adding it. Reaction of Kosovo and the subsequent intellectual criticisms would make for a good article read. Peace. 70.171.46.92 ( talk) 05:30, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Here And discuss it there. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 06:36, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
I am proposing the merger of 2 bilateral relations articles, for the main reason that the level of relations with Kosovo is very small and can easily be covered in a line or two in this article. LibStar ( talk) 07:42, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Oppose They should be separate. -- Turkish Flame ☎ 18:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
This article should be renamed to "Foreign relations of the Republic of Kosovo", because that title unambiguously describes what it is about.
The current title is inadequate because the word "Kosovo" can be taken to mean two mutually exclusive things: an independent state (thus capable of having foreign relations) or a province of Serbia (thus incapable of having foreign relations).
If we just refer to "Kosovo" in the title, then this can be interpreted as implying that all meanings of "Kosovo" are capable of having foreign relations. Since only independent states can have these, we are in effect saying that there is only one definition of "Kosovo": an independent state. This is a biased, unacceptable POV.
However, if this article's title refers to "Republic of Kosovo", then the status of Kosovo as a Serbian province is excluded from scope. This would be an unambiguous, NPOV title.
Even if you disagree that the Republic of Kosovo should exist, de facto it does. And it has foreign relations, whether you accept their legality or not. This proposed title in no way implies that Kosovo is an independent state, but that the foreign relations described in the article are with nations that regard it as such. It's NPOV.
Do you agree that the article's title should be changed?
Bazonka (
talk)
18:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
This article is obviously about the foreign relations of the partially recognized Republic of Kosovo, not Serbia's Autonomous Province of Kosovo. When will people learn to distinguish between pieces of territory, and human institutions claiming governance over pieces of territory. The foreign relations are held by such institutions, not by the patch of land known as Kosovo. There are two rival institutions, and we are talking about the one known as Republic of Kosovo. As long as people refuse to concede this very simple point, this article is pov-pushing by article title. -- dab (𒁳) 13:53, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Most of these articles are already summed up in the one sentence line on here... so we relaly need them to be articles. Believe me, i don't see any notability panning out between kosovo and some african country -- Jakezing (Your King) ( talk) 13:46, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
There is an NPOV tag dated this month and no corresponding section in the talk page to explain it. So I'll have a go.
I notice a whole list of countries that recognise Kosovo and some mentioned that are thinking about it. Apart from Serbia, I can't see any stated as having announced that they definitely won't recognise Kosovo, This suprrise me as I'm pretty sure that, for example, Russia has made announcements on the subject. For the article to be balanced all countries that have made announcements one way or the other should be listed.-- Peter cohen ( talk) 12:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
This is not a governmental international organization -- it is a private body. Kosovo (the government) is not a member of IRTU -- a private association registered in Kosovo is. Therefore it does not belong on this page, unlike the other international organizations listed, so I am removing it. -- SJK ( talk) 08:18, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Similary the FTA with Albania is no organization at all. Kosovo also had interim FTAs with few other balkan states, but anyway all of these are integrated in CEFTA. I think the Kosovo FTAs should be listed/discussed in the sections/articles for the relevant countries (Albania, Croatia, etc.) and not in the organizations list. Alinor ( talk) 20:08, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
What is this article actually about?
Is it about countries that have recognised Kosovo? (e.g. "Canada recognized Kosovo on 18 March 2008") This is a clear overlap with
International recognition of Kosovo, and this is not the sort of thing that I would call a "foreign relation of Kosovo".
Or is this article about Kosovo's embassies, ambassadors and suchlike? But again, this is an overlap with
List of diplomatic missions of Kosovo and
List of diplomatic missions in Kosovo.
I don't really understand the need for this article. Can someone clarify exactly what it's for, and then we can clean up all the unnecessary stuff? If no-one can clarify this, then I may suggest that it's deleted or merged.
Bazonka (
talk)
08:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
As of Feb 2nd, 2010 Kosovo has become a member of European Forum for GeoStatistics. Could someone please update the article. Please & Thank You!! 68.187.143.184 ( talk) Kosova2008 —Preceding undated comment added 03:19, 10 February 2010 (UTC).
Recently the section on Kosovo membership/relations with internatnional organizations was removed with the reasoning that those are not "foreign relations". I think that they should be included, because a great part of the foreign activities of every country is related to the international organizations where it participates. Also most of the foreign relations articles contain references to the organizations where the country is participating (even if not as list/table, but inside the text). Also, membership in international organizations is much more "foreign relations" than membership in sports organizations, that are currently included as link-section. Alinor ( talk) 08:29, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
I propose that only countries that have established diplomatic relations be listed in this article, not the countries that have recognised but have no relations. The full list of recognisers is at
International recognition of Kosovo - they are more appropriate there, and there is no point listing them twice. (Note that I have started a related discussion
here.)
What do you think?
Bazonka (
talk)
21:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
This article quite obviously needs to be moved to "Foreign Relations of the Republic of Kosovo" - the terms "Kosovo" and "Republic of Kosovo" are not synonymous. In addition to the above, there are many precedents to this: Foreign relations of the Republic of Ireland and Foreign relations of the Republic of Macedonia come to mind. This article needs a very LOUD WP:RM that will catch the attention of the community. -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 23:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Based on the level of controversy in the above section, #Article title, I'd say that the move proposal should be discussed, rather than boldly carried out. Whether this is done via WP:RM or by means of a content RFC is largely immaterial, I think. A requested move would be the more structured option. To get wide input, it might also be advisable to advertise the RFC to any relevant WikiProjects, obviously wording the notice as neutrally as possible. - GTBacchus( talk) 01:39, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Disagree with the proposal. As the ROK will always stay in the same article as Kosovo, there is no need for renaming. -- Sulmues Let's talk 00:43, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Disagree Everyone knows what is meant by "foreign relations of Kosovo". Also an autonomous province doesn't have the capacity to conduct foreign relations, so this seems all a bit fussy to me. If it aint broke don't fix it. IJA ( talk) 23:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
please add to the list http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2010&mm=05&dd=22&nav_id=67294 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.106.61.194 ( talk) 23:16, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
The President of Kosovo has been in Malawi for the last couple of days. Has anyone got a source saying that Kosovo and Malawi have established diplomatic relations? IJA ( talk) 15:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
I tried to sort the table by date, but it is not working propertly. user:mnw2000 15:00, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
I saw that user:DIREKTOR, had made a move of the page, although no consensus was reached above Talk:Foreign_relations_of_Kosovo#We_probably_need_a_WP:RM. Please refrain from such controversial moves. -- Sulmues ( talk) 21:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
According to this article, it looks like the Vanuatu PM and the Kosovar President signed and agreed to establish diplomatic relations. http://www.president-ksgov.net/?page=1,6,1350 Can we update? 69.203.217.91 ( talk) 10:24, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Someone please update that map to remove the inclusion on Abkhzia, South Ossetia, Northern Cyprus, Nargono-Karabakh, Trandneister,Somaliland. Also, I do not think Kosovo has established diplomatic relations with Luxembourg, Liechtenstein,etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.203.217.91 ( talk) 08:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
I propose that we add to the table two columns - number and recognition date. And that we add countries that only recognize, but haven't established relations yet - such as in Foreign relations of Montenegro.
Also, in the mission to/from columns I propose that we mention non-resident embassies (accredited ambassadors) and other missions types (consulate, liasion office, etc. from here and here). Alinor ( talk) 11:41, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Luxembourg has accepted Ilir Dugolli as non-resident ambassador of Kosovo to Lux. This marks the establishment of diplomatic relations [2] - Canadian Bobby ( talk) 18:00, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
The Portuguese ambassador to Bulgaria has presented her credentials as non-resident ambassador to Kosovo, which constitutes the establishment of diplomatic relations. - Canadian Bobby ( talk) 18:44, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
The Kosovar ambassador to Sweden presented his credentials to the president of Iceland on 15 May, thus marking the establishment of diplomatic relations. - Canadian Bobby ( talk) 01:50, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
[3] is about future diplomatic relations with Liechtenstein. It also states "MFA has initiated the process of establishing diplomatic relations with all states that have recognized Republic of Kosovo" - in this context it's interesting to watch for Kosovo–Poland relations and Polish reluctance. Japinderum ( talk) 14:34, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Kosovo is set to join the EBRD in December. There are already news reports that more than 2/3 of EBRD members voted in favor of Kosovo admission. I know that isn't equal to recognition, but does somebody have a link to a the vote breakdown? Who was for, against, abstain, absent? Japinderum ( talk) 10:13, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Naim Malaj, non-resident Ambassador to the Principality of Liechtenstein is the title of the news published today by Kosovo's MFA.
"The Principality of Liechtenstein has recognized the independence of the Republic of Kosovo on 25 March 2008. Both countries have established diplomatic relations on June 22, 2012." reportedly the press release. [4] --Irvi Hyka 16:57, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
It seems that'll happen soon [5], then [6]. Japinderum ( talk) 07:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Those were shown on the map as having established diplomatic relations, but for Brunei we don't have any source and for Malawi the source provided doesn't state so. I asked the editors who added those about sources, so most probably they will add those soon. Until then I'll hide Malawi from the table. Japinderum ( talk) 10:17, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
In the article about Senegal establishing diplomatic relations with Kosovo, it says that Kosovo now has diplomatic relations with 65. However, adding Senegal pushes our number up to 66. We have an extra. Anyone know which country we have listed that actually hasn't established relations with KS? - ILBobby ( talk) 16:43, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 12:25, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
There's nothing of substance in the Kosovo-Panama relations article that can't easily be fit into the main article. There's no evidence that this subject merits an independent article per WP:N. - Mr X 16:52, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Foreign relations of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Foreign relations of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Foreign relations of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.kosovapress.com/ks/index.php?cid=2,2,49802When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:51, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Why is the northern most island of Japan blue on the map? 99.248.171.62 ( talk) 19:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Foreign relations of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:02, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
nato and eu. I ask you to add to the article current information on whether Kosovo is going to join the EU and NATO in the future. Now it is not clear from this article whether Kosovo wants to become a member of the EU and NATO. 46.72.199.115 ( talk) 18:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Oman and Guinea Bissau have withdrawn their decisions to recognize Kosovo’s independence
http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2011&mm=09&dd=08&nav_id=76291 77.105.49.83 ( talk) 13:47, 8 September 2011 (UTC) Nothing was withdrawn. 2003:DB:6738:901:BDA5:C013:8471:1C5 ( talk) 19:15, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was no consensus to merge. The merge proposal was rejected. Bring up new proposals in light of the below comments. -- Yellowdesk ( talk) 00:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
PROPOSAL
Please There is no point in having two articles and there is not enough content to justify a split. -
Justin (koavf)·
T·
C·
M
23:32, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
IceDragon64 ( talk) 00:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Could we not have straw polls at two places at the same time? — Kurykh 00:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
The two articles should never be merged because the article International reaction to the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence in future will remain as a historical document to the response of Kosovo Independence. The foreign relation article will not be able to document the international facts in details. So the two articles should never be merged. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 17:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
When Montenegro became independent, all the recognitions and establishments of diplomatic relations and embassies were noted in foreign relations of Montenegro; I see no reason why the article foreign relations of Kosovo can't serve in the same way. — Nightstallion 17:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Maybe It seems like the consensus is to merge in a little while, so I guess a week or so? - Justin (koavf)· T· C· M 02:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
The articles should not be merged. Kosovo is not legally a state under UNSCR 1244 and under Chapter 1, Article 2 of the UN Charter, therefore it cannot have foreign relations. Kosovo's foreign relations are legitimately dealt with by the government of Serbia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FergusM1970 ( talk • contribs) 23:49, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Kosovo is a state as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Therefore this article should stay and continue to develop. Jawohl ( talk) 11:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Since when is B.Clinton Ambassador of Saudi Arabia in Prishtina? Jawohl ( talk) 15:24, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
I am new around and would like to know who did it. They also put Mother Teresa as ambassador in Slovenia!!! Jawohl ( talk) 16:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
I posted this at the "International Reaction" page but they weren't too charitable... just wondering whether its worth mentioning that for the first time there will be a Miss Kosovo competing at Miss Universe 2008. The pageant is being held in Vietnam and the Vietnamese government initially would not give her a visa to compete... she eventually travelled on an Albanian passport although apparantly the officials weren't thrilled about that situation either. And please don't dismiss Miss Universe as fluff, its been around for nearly sixty years and as far as I am aware this is one of the first major international competitions that will have a Kosovan representative. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 00:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
This is a particularly relevant foreign relations issue that should be included in the article. I'm just putting the idea out there and will not actually bother with adding it. Reaction of Kosovo and the subsequent intellectual criticisms would make for a good article read. Peace. 70.171.46.92 ( talk) 05:30, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Here And discuss it there. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 06:36, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
I am proposing the merger of 2 bilateral relations articles, for the main reason that the level of relations with Kosovo is very small and can easily be covered in a line or two in this article. LibStar ( talk) 07:42, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Oppose They should be separate. -- Turkish Flame ☎ 18:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
This article should be renamed to "Foreign relations of the Republic of Kosovo", because that title unambiguously describes what it is about.
The current title is inadequate because the word "Kosovo" can be taken to mean two mutually exclusive things: an independent state (thus capable of having foreign relations) or a province of Serbia (thus incapable of having foreign relations).
If we just refer to "Kosovo" in the title, then this can be interpreted as implying that all meanings of "Kosovo" are capable of having foreign relations. Since only independent states can have these, we are in effect saying that there is only one definition of "Kosovo": an independent state. This is a biased, unacceptable POV.
However, if this article's title refers to "Republic of Kosovo", then the status of Kosovo as a Serbian province is excluded from scope. This would be an unambiguous, NPOV title.
Even if you disagree that the Republic of Kosovo should exist, de facto it does. And it has foreign relations, whether you accept their legality or not. This proposed title in no way implies that Kosovo is an independent state, but that the foreign relations described in the article are with nations that regard it as such. It's NPOV.
Do you agree that the article's title should be changed?
Bazonka (
talk)
18:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
This article is obviously about the foreign relations of the partially recognized Republic of Kosovo, not Serbia's Autonomous Province of Kosovo. When will people learn to distinguish between pieces of territory, and human institutions claiming governance over pieces of territory. The foreign relations are held by such institutions, not by the patch of land known as Kosovo. There are two rival institutions, and we are talking about the one known as Republic of Kosovo. As long as people refuse to concede this very simple point, this article is pov-pushing by article title. -- dab (𒁳) 13:53, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Most of these articles are already summed up in the one sentence line on here... so we relaly need them to be articles. Believe me, i don't see any notability panning out between kosovo and some african country -- Jakezing (Your King) ( talk) 13:46, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
There is an NPOV tag dated this month and no corresponding section in the talk page to explain it. So I'll have a go.
I notice a whole list of countries that recognise Kosovo and some mentioned that are thinking about it. Apart from Serbia, I can't see any stated as having announced that they definitely won't recognise Kosovo, This suprrise me as I'm pretty sure that, for example, Russia has made announcements on the subject. For the article to be balanced all countries that have made announcements one way or the other should be listed.-- Peter cohen ( talk) 12:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
This is not a governmental international organization -- it is a private body. Kosovo (the government) is not a member of IRTU -- a private association registered in Kosovo is. Therefore it does not belong on this page, unlike the other international organizations listed, so I am removing it. -- SJK ( talk) 08:18, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Similary the FTA with Albania is no organization at all. Kosovo also had interim FTAs with few other balkan states, but anyway all of these are integrated in CEFTA. I think the Kosovo FTAs should be listed/discussed in the sections/articles for the relevant countries (Albania, Croatia, etc.) and not in the organizations list. Alinor ( talk) 20:08, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
What is this article actually about?
Is it about countries that have recognised Kosovo? (e.g. "Canada recognized Kosovo on 18 March 2008") This is a clear overlap with
International recognition of Kosovo, and this is not the sort of thing that I would call a "foreign relation of Kosovo".
Or is this article about Kosovo's embassies, ambassadors and suchlike? But again, this is an overlap with
List of diplomatic missions of Kosovo and
List of diplomatic missions in Kosovo.
I don't really understand the need for this article. Can someone clarify exactly what it's for, and then we can clean up all the unnecessary stuff? If no-one can clarify this, then I may suggest that it's deleted or merged.
Bazonka (
talk)
08:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
As of Feb 2nd, 2010 Kosovo has become a member of European Forum for GeoStatistics. Could someone please update the article. Please & Thank You!! 68.187.143.184 ( talk) Kosova2008 —Preceding undated comment added 03:19, 10 February 2010 (UTC).
Recently the section on Kosovo membership/relations with internatnional organizations was removed with the reasoning that those are not "foreign relations". I think that they should be included, because a great part of the foreign activities of every country is related to the international organizations where it participates. Also most of the foreign relations articles contain references to the organizations where the country is participating (even if not as list/table, but inside the text). Also, membership in international organizations is much more "foreign relations" than membership in sports organizations, that are currently included as link-section. Alinor ( talk) 08:29, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
I propose that only countries that have established diplomatic relations be listed in this article, not the countries that have recognised but have no relations. The full list of recognisers is at
International recognition of Kosovo - they are more appropriate there, and there is no point listing them twice. (Note that I have started a related discussion
here.)
What do you think?
Bazonka (
talk)
21:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
This article quite obviously needs to be moved to "Foreign Relations of the Republic of Kosovo" - the terms "Kosovo" and "Republic of Kosovo" are not synonymous. In addition to the above, there are many precedents to this: Foreign relations of the Republic of Ireland and Foreign relations of the Republic of Macedonia come to mind. This article needs a very LOUD WP:RM that will catch the attention of the community. -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 23:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Based on the level of controversy in the above section, #Article title, I'd say that the move proposal should be discussed, rather than boldly carried out. Whether this is done via WP:RM or by means of a content RFC is largely immaterial, I think. A requested move would be the more structured option. To get wide input, it might also be advisable to advertise the RFC to any relevant WikiProjects, obviously wording the notice as neutrally as possible. - GTBacchus( talk) 01:39, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Disagree with the proposal. As the ROK will always stay in the same article as Kosovo, there is no need for renaming. -- Sulmues Let's talk 00:43, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Disagree Everyone knows what is meant by "foreign relations of Kosovo". Also an autonomous province doesn't have the capacity to conduct foreign relations, so this seems all a bit fussy to me. If it aint broke don't fix it. IJA ( talk) 23:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
please add to the list http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2010&mm=05&dd=22&nav_id=67294 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.106.61.194 ( talk) 23:16, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
The President of Kosovo has been in Malawi for the last couple of days. Has anyone got a source saying that Kosovo and Malawi have established diplomatic relations? IJA ( talk) 15:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
I tried to sort the table by date, but it is not working propertly. user:mnw2000 15:00, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
I saw that user:DIREKTOR, had made a move of the page, although no consensus was reached above Talk:Foreign_relations_of_Kosovo#We_probably_need_a_WP:RM. Please refrain from such controversial moves. -- Sulmues ( talk) 21:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
According to this article, it looks like the Vanuatu PM and the Kosovar President signed and agreed to establish diplomatic relations. http://www.president-ksgov.net/?page=1,6,1350 Can we update? 69.203.217.91 ( talk) 10:24, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Someone please update that map to remove the inclusion on Abkhzia, South Ossetia, Northern Cyprus, Nargono-Karabakh, Trandneister,Somaliland. Also, I do not think Kosovo has established diplomatic relations with Luxembourg, Liechtenstein,etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.203.217.91 ( talk) 08:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
I propose that we add to the table two columns - number and recognition date. And that we add countries that only recognize, but haven't established relations yet - such as in Foreign relations of Montenegro.
Also, in the mission to/from columns I propose that we mention non-resident embassies (accredited ambassadors) and other missions types (consulate, liasion office, etc. from here and here). Alinor ( talk) 11:41, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Luxembourg has accepted Ilir Dugolli as non-resident ambassador of Kosovo to Lux. This marks the establishment of diplomatic relations [2] - Canadian Bobby ( talk) 18:00, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
The Portuguese ambassador to Bulgaria has presented her credentials as non-resident ambassador to Kosovo, which constitutes the establishment of diplomatic relations. - Canadian Bobby ( talk) 18:44, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
The Kosovar ambassador to Sweden presented his credentials to the president of Iceland on 15 May, thus marking the establishment of diplomatic relations. - Canadian Bobby ( talk) 01:50, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
[3] is about future diplomatic relations with Liechtenstein. It also states "MFA has initiated the process of establishing diplomatic relations with all states that have recognized Republic of Kosovo" - in this context it's interesting to watch for Kosovo–Poland relations and Polish reluctance. Japinderum ( talk) 14:34, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Kosovo is set to join the EBRD in December. There are already news reports that more than 2/3 of EBRD members voted in favor of Kosovo admission. I know that isn't equal to recognition, but does somebody have a link to a the vote breakdown? Who was for, against, abstain, absent? Japinderum ( talk) 10:13, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Naim Malaj, non-resident Ambassador to the Principality of Liechtenstein is the title of the news published today by Kosovo's MFA.
"The Principality of Liechtenstein has recognized the independence of the Republic of Kosovo on 25 March 2008. Both countries have established diplomatic relations on June 22, 2012." reportedly the press release. [4] --Irvi Hyka 16:57, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
It seems that'll happen soon [5], then [6]. Japinderum ( talk) 07:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Those were shown on the map as having established diplomatic relations, but for Brunei we don't have any source and for Malawi the source provided doesn't state so. I asked the editors who added those about sources, so most probably they will add those soon. Until then I'll hide Malawi from the table. Japinderum ( talk) 10:17, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
In the article about Senegal establishing diplomatic relations with Kosovo, it says that Kosovo now has diplomatic relations with 65. However, adding Senegal pushes our number up to 66. We have an extra. Anyone know which country we have listed that actually hasn't established relations with KS? - ILBobby ( talk) 16:43, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 12:25, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
There's nothing of substance in the Kosovo-Panama relations article that can't easily be fit into the main article. There's no evidence that this subject merits an independent article per WP:N. - Mr X 16:52, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Foreign relations of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Foreign relations of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Foreign relations of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.kosovapress.com/ks/index.php?cid=2,2,49802When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:51, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Why is the northern most island of Japan blue on the map? 99.248.171.62 ( talk) 19:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Foreign relations of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:02, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
nato and eu. I ask you to add to the article current information on whether Kosovo is going to join the EU and NATO in the future. Now it is not clear from this article whether Kosovo wants to become a member of the EU and NATO. 46.72.199.115 ( talk) 18:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)