Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you!

You might be interested in the discussion at Talk:Coat_of_arms_of_the_Palestinian_National_Authority#Scope. I'm telling you this because you were involved at a related discussion.

Hello, Japinderum. You have new messages at Talk:Coat_of_arms_of_the_Palestinian_National_Authority#Scope.
Message added 07:58, 22 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 07:58, 22 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Your addition to United Nations System has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

"The relationship agreement between IAEA and the UN is contained in resolution of the UN General Assembly"
vs
"The relationship agreement between IAEA and the UN is contained in resolution 1145 (XII) of the UN General Assembly"

You've been editing here for what, nearly a decade? Are there many more examples of this that the project needs to be made aware of? A quick glance at your recent edit history reveals several concerning edits (ie [1]). TDL ( talk) 09:25, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply

You must be kidding. First you complain something is unsourced, then I use an official source to back it up and you cry copyvio? The edit you reverted was close to the source, because of your constant objections that I make that up. Japinderum ( talk) 06:43, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Why would I joke about something this serious? If you can't understand the difference between my request that you cite reliable sources, and WP:PLAGIARISM of reliable sources then that's a big problem. TDL ( talk) 21:47, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply

I see you filed a complaint, we can discuss there. Japinderum ( talk) 07:02, 28 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi, I have made a request for Third Opinion, on the issue we had been tackling for sometime at Talk:State_of_Palestine#Third_Opinion with no result. -- Mor2 ( talk) 20:23, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello, Japinderum. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. TDL ( talk) 23:12, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply

At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coat of arms of the State of Palestine I interpreted your vote to mean "Redirect to Coat of arms of the Palestinian National Authority", but the closing admin interpreted it as an ambiguous "redirect" vote, without a particular target. Which did you mean? Please responded at Talk:Coat of arms of the State of Palestine. Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 19:55, 1 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Tell me, is this source [2] an authoritative?-- Murza-Zade ( talk) 16:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Doesn't open right now. Japinderum ( talk) 05:53, 6 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Doesn't open for me either, the problem is probably at the websites end. Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 05:56, 6 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Here's the Google cache version. Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 05:57, 6 April 2013 (UTC) reply

I wouldn't class this as "top notch" RS, but it seems OK enough to back "Mongolia embassy in Cairo accredited" in Foreign relations of the PLO and List of diplomatic missions in Palestine. Japinderum ( talk) 06:03, 6 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Would you like to address this, I think you can explain it allot better then I can. Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 04:20, 5 May 2013 (UTC) reply

You want to take a break from your wiki-break and weigh in at Talk:State of Palestine#Proposed merge with Palestinian territories? I tried to explain the relationship between the PLO, PNA, and SOP, but I don't think I did a good job. Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 13:23, 8 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, among the countries, which recognised South Sudan (light green countries), is missing Thailand ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_relations_of_South_Sudan , number 110). Hejhulák ( talk) 15:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

The file File:Hague Conference on Private International Law.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Made obsolete by 2015 version: File:Members of the Hague Conference on Private International Law.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:14, 24 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The file File:Organisation for Joint Armament Cooperation.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

The file File:European Audiovisual Observatory.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC) reply