For Washington has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 19, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 22:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
I'll have this to you soon
JAG
UAR
22:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
I had to do a little bit of cleaning up, but this should be good to go. The references are adequate and the article is quite comprehensive given the era. Well done JAG UAR 22:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
For Washington has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 19, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 22:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
I'll have this to you soon
JAG
UAR
22:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
I had to do a little bit of cleaning up, but this should be good to go. The references are adequate and the article is quite comprehensive given the era. Well done JAG UAR 22:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)