This article was nominated for deletion on 9 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Wine Start‑class ( inactive) | |||||||
|
This article is commercial linkspam. It should be deleted. Xxanthippe ( talk) 23:07, 29 May 2008 (UTC).
Please do not remove the Folie a Deux Winery link from the Folie a Deux page. Thank you very much. I would also like to add that I am a fairly new contributor to Wikipedia and I am trying very hard to adhere to all the standards. I appreciate your Folie a Deux page, and I feel the winery is a valid link due to my participation in WikiProject Wine. Lucy456 ( talk)
I've reverted your removal of the external link in Folie a deux winery. An external link to the website of the article subject is compliant with WP:EL, and spcifically, "Articles about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to the official site if any." If you fee that the article itself is spam, then you could propose it for deletion, but I don'y see how it is spam. -- Whpq ( talk) 10:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
I added a prod tag as in my opinion the subject of this article is not notable, as per WP:N. -- BodegasAmbite ( talk) 21:20, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 9 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Wine Start‑class ( inactive) | |||||||
|
This article is commercial linkspam. It should be deleted. Xxanthippe ( talk) 23:07, 29 May 2008 (UTC).
Please do not remove the Folie a Deux Winery link from the Folie a Deux page. Thank you very much. I would also like to add that I am a fairly new contributor to Wikipedia and I am trying very hard to adhere to all the standards. I appreciate your Folie a Deux page, and I feel the winery is a valid link due to my participation in WikiProject Wine. Lucy456 ( talk)
I've reverted your removal of the external link in Folie a deux winery. An external link to the website of the article subject is compliant with WP:EL, and spcifically, "Articles about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to the official site if any." If you fee that the article itself is spam, then you could propose it for deletion, but I don'y see how it is spam. -- Whpq ( talk) 10:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
I added a prod tag as in my opinion the subject of this article is not notable, as per WP:N. -- BodegasAmbite ( talk) 21:20, 27 April 2009 (UTC)