![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 12 September 2020, it was proposed that this article be moved from Florestan, Prince of Monaco to Florestan. The result of the discussion was not moved.. |
This text in this article appears to be taken directly from http://www.philatelia.net/bonapart/plots/?more=1&id=122. It appears that the author of this website may have taken it from a book listed in the Bibliography section of that website, but it is difficult to tell which, if it is the case at all. Chuychuychuy98 ( talk) 04:44, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
How come Florestan is styled Florestan I ("the first"), when to my knowledge there hasn't been a Florestan II ("the second")? I thought a monarch/Prince was only given an enumeration if there was more than one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.66.115.174 ( talk) 15:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
The current policy is as per this MoS reference:
Perhaps Nunh-huh is referring to this section on disputes over styles:
The substantial reason for the change in date formats in this article is that Monaco uses the "littleendian" international date format of Day Month Year. In addition, the date formats were inconsistent and I rationalised them, as per my edit summary. -- Jumbo 00:56, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Florestan received only a small income from his family, so, as it turned out, his marriage to a descendent of one of the old families of Champagne (province) was, in fact, "financially favorable."
The result of the move request was: not moved due to consensus. ( non-admin closure) Heart (talk) 03:37, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
– The title is more concise. Interstellarity ( talk) 11:57, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
(non-automated message) Greetings! I have opened an RfC on WT:ROYALTY that may be of interest to users following this article talk page! You are encouraged to contribute to this discussion here! Hurricane Andrew ( 444) 18:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 12 September 2020, it was proposed that this article be moved from Florestan, Prince of Monaco to Florestan. The result of the discussion was not moved.. |
This text in this article appears to be taken directly from http://www.philatelia.net/bonapart/plots/?more=1&id=122. It appears that the author of this website may have taken it from a book listed in the Bibliography section of that website, but it is difficult to tell which, if it is the case at all. Chuychuychuy98 ( talk) 04:44, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
How come Florestan is styled Florestan I ("the first"), when to my knowledge there hasn't been a Florestan II ("the second")? I thought a monarch/Prince was only given an enumeration if there was more than one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.66.115.174 ( talk) 15:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
The current policy is as per this MoS reference:
Perhaps Nunh-huh is referring to this section on disputes over styles:
The substantial reason for the change in date formats in this article is that Monaco uses the "littleendian" international date format of Day Month Year. In addition, the date formats were inconsistent and I rationalised them, as per my edit summary. -- Jumbo 00:56, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Florestan received only a small income from his family, so, as it turned out, his marriage to a descendent of one of the old families of Champagne (province) was, in fact, "financially favorable."
The result of the move request was: not moved due to consensus. ( non-admin closure) Heart (talk) 03:37, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
– The title is more concise. Interstellarity ( talk) 11:57, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
(non-automated message) Greetings! I have opened an RfC on WT:ROYALTY that may be of interest to users following this article talk page! You are encouraged to contribute to this discussion here! Hurricane Andrew ( 444) 18:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC)