This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wow, that's pretty slanderous. Has anyone involved with this page even read the book "Floreana"? I just did and came here looking for more about Margret Wittmer. According to her book, they had nothing whatsoever to do with Hitler. I hope their family don't see this page! I'm shocked that this would be on here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.198.42.106 ( talk) 22:36, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
I can't believe that statement about the picture of Hittler at the Wittmers house. Obviusly, the person that wrote that must have seeing to make such slanderous statement. The Wittmers were close to the US Navy and helped them during the second world war years.
Wikipedia will really continue to lose credibility if they don't put an end to uncorroborated information before they publish. Unbelieveable. 130.76.96.155 ( talk) 14:24, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Well, maybe. In any case these sources
were listed but completely unused by the article. Kindly restore them only once they are being used to verify some point within the article. — LlywelynII 15:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wow, that's pretty slanderous. Has anyone involved with this page even read the book "Floreana"? I just did and came here looking for more about Margret Wittmer. According to her book, they had nothing whatsoever to do with Hitler. I hope their family don't see this page! I'm shocked that this would be on here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.198.42.106 ( talk) 22:36, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
I can't believe that statement about the picture of Hittler at the Wittmers house. Obviusly, the person that wrote that must have seeing to make such slanderous statement. The Wittmers were close to the US Navy and helped them during the second world war years.
Wikipedia will really continue to lose credibility if they don't put an end to uncorroborated information before they publish. Unbelieveable. 130.76.96.155 ( talk) 14:24, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Well, maybe. In any case these sources
were listed but completely unused by the article. Kindly restore them only once they are being used to verify some point within the article. — LlywelynII 15:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)