This article was nominated for deletion on 9 September 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was tagged for speedy deletion under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion but a reviewing administrator or uninvolved experienced editor declined the request. This article should not be tagged again for speedy deletion under the same criterion and, unless a valid, separate speedy deletion basis exists, further attempts at deleting this article should be made via the proposed deletion process (prod) if uncontroversial, or the article taken to articles for deletion (AfD) for debate on the merits. Note: this template should be removed once the associated article has survived an AfD debate; or has been significantly changed such that further speedy deletion requests are unlikely. |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issue. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
I like to contest the speedy deletion request which states does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject At first glance winning a business website of the year award is notable. It is an important resource in the aerospace industry and the archive feature is an important resource for many wikipedia articles. I think a clean-up tag would have been more appropriate on a two-year-old article to let interested editors and the aviation project improve the article. If the deletion tag is removed it will give us time to improve the references, nothing stopping the proposer coming back in a few weeks and proposing the article for deletion if they still not happy. MilborneOne ( talk) 12:49, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
The nature of commentary on websites is such that it is rarely found in offline publications. However, this online analysis by Ludo Van Vooren in his Aerospace eBusiness blog is very instructive. LeadSongDog come howl! 18:28, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
I have removed the word "unique" and then the word "unmatched" The source is a press release and we don't need promotional words like unique or unmatched in neutrally written encyclopedia. Theroadislong ( talk) 13:14, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Flight Global Marketing Team is a major contributor to this article (WP:COI) LukeWWF ( talk) 10:58, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
We already have an article on Wikipedia detailing the history of Flight International (since 1909, oldest continuously published, yada, yada), so I don't see how Flight Global can also be credited with all that; they are merely the latest publishers. Further, the archive library is no longer available unless you pay a subscription. The article should focus on Flight Global, and their particular achievements. I'm not sure yet exactly what editing is required to render that. WendlingCrusader ( talk) 17:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 9 September 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was tagged for speedy deletion under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion but a reviewing administrator or uninvolved experienced editor declined the request. This article should not be tagged again for speedy deletion under the same criterion and, unless a valid, separate speedy deletion basis exists, further attempts at deleting this article should be made via the proposed deletion process (prod) if uncontroversial, or the article taken to articles for deletion (AfD) for debate on the merits. Note: this template should be removed once the associated article has survived an AfD debate; or has been significantly changed such that further speedy deletion requests are unlikely. |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issue. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
I like to contest the speedy deletion request which states does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject At first glance winning a business website of the year award is notable. It is an important resource in the aerospace industry and the archive feature is an important resource for many wikipedia articles. I think a clean-up tag would have been more appropriate on a two-year-old article to let interested editors and the aviation project improve the article. If the deletion tag is removed it will give us time to improve the references, nothing stopping the proposer coming back in a few weeks and proposing the article for deletion if they still not happy. MilborneOne ( talk) 12:49, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
The nature of commentary on websites is such that it is rarely found in offline publications. However, this online analysis by Ludo Van Vooren in his Aerospace eBusiness blog is very instructive. LeadSongDog come howl! 18:28, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
I have removed the word "unique" and then the word "unmatched" The source is a press release and we don't need promotional words like unique or unmatched in neutrally written encyclopedia. Theroadislong ( talk) 13:14, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Flight Global Marketing Team is a major contributor to this article (WP:COI) LukeWWF ( talk) 10:58, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
We already have an article on Wikipedia detailing the history of Flight International (since 1909, oldest continuously published, yada, yada), so I don't see how Flight Global can also be credited with all that; they are merely the latest publishers. Further, the archive library is no longer available unless you pay a subscription. The article should focus on Flight Global, and their particular achievements. I'm not sure yet exactly what editing is required to render that. WendlingCrusader ( talk) 17:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)