This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fleshcrawl article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The article is in need of cleanup. Do not remove the tags until the things tagged wrong are corrected. The article cites no sources whatsoever and external links don't count. The biography section reads poorly and it needs to be cut into sections for easier reading. I'll be keeping an eye on this article.-- Leon Sword 01:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
added style section... needs an additional citation - i'm looking for it presently. may need a more experienced editor to look over it, maybe make some changes. i personally think it looks fine, but i've been wrong before. AeturnalNarcosis 14.Aug.2007
what the shit? i spent hours making the chart of their albums for the discography and some twat took it out? that's bullshit. i'm going to remake it... NO ONE TOUCH IT!!! AeturnalNarcosis 2.Nov (by the way, that's a signature)
now, with all the work i've put into it, with LeonSword's help, would anyone agree that is it better than a "start class" page? AeturnalNarcosis 20:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Please stop changing things without discussing it here first. I spent alot of time and effort making it the way it is; it's perfect, please don't change it. AeturnalNarcosis ( talk) 03:18, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
this is ridiculous... cornus is essentially getting away with vandalising this page and i am getting blamed? the chronology of their albums requires album cover images because the images represent the music on each release, and it shows the progression of their style in an artistic way. but then again, you would have to actually have heard their music to realise and understand such a concept. but why speculate... i say we debate it openly. here. any editor who comes across this page, please leave your two cents worth; do you think the album cover art should be shown in their release chronology, or should it be plain text? i.e., should cornus be allowed to continually degrade and vandalise this page, or should it be restored?
AeturnalNarcosis ( talk) 21:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
would you people please, for the love of whatever deities you may pray to, stop removing shit without discussing it first? is that too much to ask? ...was the article discussion page a waste of time? the reason i undid the previous editor's changes is this: i don't feel any rules are being violated by the german flag icon or the band's logo, the latter of which is used as opposed to a band photo because no free-media photo exists and the one i uploaded was removed by some prick. thus, the flag icon and band logo stay. AeturnalNarcosis ( talk) 21:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Is this article the arena for a good ol' fashioned, down-home, texas-style douche off or what? seems like every prick with an anal phallus implant has to degrade this article. this isn't some out-dated revision of world book -- we don't have to limit the articles to save space in the book. you schmucks have taken every other image off from this article, the least you can do is leave the logo. AeturnalNarcosis ( talk) 14:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
JUSTIFICATION FOR COVER IMAGE:
AeturnalNarcosis ( talk) 15:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
JUSTIFICATION FOR LOGO
AeturnalNarcosis ( talk) 21:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
JUSTIFICATION FOR BAND IMAGE
AeturnalNarcosis ( talk) 31:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fleshcrawl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fleshcrawl article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The article is in need of cleanup. Do not remove the tags until the things tagged wrong are corrected. The article cites no sources whatsoever and external links don't count. The biography section reads poorly and it needs to be cut into sections for easier reading. I'll be keeping an eye on this article.-- Leon Sword 01:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
added style section... needs an additional citation - i'm looking for it presently. may need a more experienced editor to look over it, maybe make some changes. i personally think it looks fine, but i've been wrong before. AeturnalNarcosis 14.Aug.2007
what the shit? i spent hours making the chart of their albums for the discography and some twat took it out? that's bullshit. i'm going to remake it... NO ONE TOUCH IT!!! AeturnalNarcosis 2.Nov (by the way, that's a signature)
now, with all the work i've put into it, with LeonSword's help, would anyone agree that is it better than a "start class" page? AeturnalNarcosis 20:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Please stop changing things without discussing it here first. I spent alot of time and effort making it the way it is; it's perfect, please don't change it. AeturnalNarcosis ( talk) 03:18, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
this is ridiculous... cornus is essentially getting away with vandalising this page and i am getting blamed? the chronology of their albums requires album cover images because the images represent the music on each release, and it shows the progression of their style in an artistic way. but then again, you would have to actually have heard their music to realise and understand such a concept. but why speculate... i say we debate it openly. here. any editor who comes across this page, please leave your two cents worth; do you think the album cover art should be shown in their release chronology, or should it be plain text? i.e., should cornus be allowed to continually degrade and vandalise this page, or should it be restored?
AeturnalNarcosis ( talk) 21:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
would you people please, for the love of whatever deities you may pray to, stop removing shit without discussing it first? is that too much to ask? ...was the article discussion page a waste of time? the reason i undid the previous editor's changes is this: i don't feel any rules are being violated by the german flag icon or the band's logo, the latter of which is used as opposed to a band photo because no free-media photo exists and the one i uploaded was removed by some prick. thus, the flag icon and band logo stay. AeturnalNarcosis ( talk) 21:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Is this article the arena for a good ol' fashioned, down-home, texas-style douche off or what? seems like every prick with an anal phallus implant has to degrade this article. this isn't some out-dated revision of world book -- we don't have to limit the articles to save space in the book. you schmucks have taken every other image off from this article, the least you can do is leave the logo. AeturnalNarcosis ( talk) 14:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
JUSTIFICATION FOR COVER IMAGE:
AeturnalNarcosis ( talk) 15:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
JUSTIFICATION FOR LOGO
AeturnalNarcosis ( talk) 21:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
JUSTIFICATION FOR BAND IMAGE
AeturnalNarcosis ( talk) 31:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fleshcrawl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)