![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Very-Best-Fleetwood-Mac/dp/B002N3GD44/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1271791552&sr=8-2 I know Amazon has the year right on this - I worked at a cd distribution company in late '09 and packed hundreds of these - how does it not have its own entry by now, let alone a listing on this ? ☭ мдснєтє тдлк ЅТЦФФ 19:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
This was a CD set containing three previously released albums: Fleetwood Mac, Tango in the Night and Mirage.
http://www.discogs.com/Fleetwood-Mac-Trilogy-Three-Classic-Albums/release/1827390
Not certain if it should properly go under Compilations or Studio Albums. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.170.145.22 ( talk) 15:29, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Fleetwood Mac in Chicago is listed as a "studio album" on this page, but this throws the numbering of the albums on their own respective pages into disarray. Kiln House states that it is the "fourth studio album", Future Games states that it is the "fifth studio album", and so on, when in actual fact the fourth album is "Fleetwood Mac in Chicago" if it is an actual studio album. One way or the other there is a mistake that needs to be corrected, but which mistake depends on what we are going to class the album as. Is it a studio album or isn't it? Burbridge92 ( talk) 18:53, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Now that this article has been protected, can the two editors who want to make changes please state what they want to do. No doubt some of it is fine, but you don't agree with each other on all of it. Bretonbanquet ( talk) 01:08, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi, well to start of with the number of singles in the infobox don't match the number in the singles section.
The Video section in the infobox state the number of videos is 0 even though there is a dvd section (Which should be titled videos not dvd releases as most were released on video years before dvd came out.) there should not be a section titled archival releases. How many other pages have them? so i took the releases from that section and listed them in the compilation or live album sections.
I think the Music videos and Video albums should be put in a section the same as Albums are (Studio, Live, Compilation.)
The 1968 Fleetwood Mac album has also known as Peter Green's Fleetwood Mac by it but the other Fleetwood Mac album (From 1975) doesn't say also known as The White Album, so i think both should just be simply listed as fleetwood mac, people can tell the albums apart easily without that by (1. the year or 2. clicking on the albums page.)
There should not be a list of tours on a discography page. this key is mentioned on top of the singles page Key to chart headings: UK (United Kingdom), U.S. (United States), U.S. Rock (United States Billboard Mainstream Rock Tracks), U.S. AC (United States Billboard Adult Contemporary Tracks), CAN (Canada), AUS (Australia), IRL (Ireland), GER (Germany), NL (Netherlands), FRA (France), NOR (Norway), AUT (Austria). it is not used on any other people can see what they are by clicking on the info at the top of the chart. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 01:24, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
My Opinion SORTED
TO BE DISCUSSED
Everything that has been discussed so far i am happy with but im still a bit unsure to what will happen to the Archival releases. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 01:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
I agree with most of what you said, i think the singles section instead of leaving the tables blank but N/A or something to indicate better. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 02:09, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
I am happy for the page to stay like it is for now if you are.
Do you mean you think we should keep them all listed together like they are now but just rename the section? Lukejordan02 ( talk) 02:31, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
So what now then,(I Don't no what country your in but it is currently 3:37 A.M in the UK.) Lukejordan02 ( talk) 02:38, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
The main purpose of my edit on this page was nothing but a simplification of too messy wikitable, because it makes the article unnecessarily large. I saved the article at a time (after trying a thousand times of previews), simply because making too much consecutive posts (like Lukejordan02 did) are not desirable for Wikipedia. I think there's no need to discuss about such kind of edits basically, because it's NOT a major changes at all. I have nothing to say about anything else, so I entrust any other contributions to other editors. Fugreena 04:36, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
I have took my previous edits and added in the things we have talked over, here is a preview. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 18:09, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
I have no problem with the incorrect videos being removed but I don't no what's what. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 23:08, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
If you want to edit the tables above to show how it should look when it's done then that's fine. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 23:09, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes, Dragonfly did chart on the physical single chart. Some record store was having a vinyl sale. Combined with the fact that we never got a US release for Dragonfly, the song hit #9. I don't think these minor charts are supposed to be included on this page. I may be wrong though; the Rock Mainstream chart is one of the charts included, so maybe other minor charts can too. As for Canada and New Zealand, I only have some information on peak positions. 25 Years hit #1 in New Zealand and Opus Collection hit the top 200. When I get the chance, I'll include Canada and New Zealand. "Go Your Own Way" and "Oh Well" are already included. Don't know about the certifications though.
I was also able to obtain chart information for Italy, so I'll be sure to add that sometime. Dobbyelf62 ( talk) 20:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
There's still the question of the other compilation albums which were removed and have to go back in. I can either put them in the table with the others, or have two groups – one in the table consisting of albums that charted, and a second list of albums that did not chart. I don't mind either way. Bretonbanquet ( talk) 18:33, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
I think it would be best to have them all listed under the one table (as the Rolling Stones & the Beatles pages have for example.) If you could add them that would be great as I don't no what's missing. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 20:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for the help the page looks really good, adding notes for repeated releases is a GREAT idea and should be the way forward on all discography pages (rather than add 4 or 5 of the same album under different names as it is really confusing.) Lukejordan02 ( talk) 22:14, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Fleetwood Mac discography's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "ARIA":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:19, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
I think the chart positions for this song are mixed up. I believe it peaked at 43 in the U.S., based on the As Long As you Follow page [1] not the U.K. BrianHagan ( talk) 01:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
References
How about listing UK and US certifications in singles instead of some 'lesser' countries chart positions - like you do in albums.
Albatross - 250,000 Silver (physical) Tusk - 250,000 Silver (physical)
Go Your Own Way - 400,000 Gold (download) The Chain - 200,000 Silver (download) Dreams - 200,000 Silver (download) Everywhere - 200,000 Silver (download)
and in the US Dreams - 1,000,000 Gold (physical) 1 million for gold back in 1970s The Chain - 500,000 Gold (download)
(
Coachtripfan (
talk)
17:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC))
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Fleetwood Mac discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:51, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
...reached #16 on this Canadian Adult Contemporary chart, but I couldn't get the table to co-operate to include the info. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/028020/f2/nlc008388.6027.pdf 2001:56A:F414:D300:8832:46C4:A535:A13D ( talk) 02:36, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
16th studio album, Time, seems to have dropped out of the discography. It's still in the category Fleetwood Mac albums, and at /info/en/?search=Time_(Fleetwood_Mac_album) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smcleish ( talk • contribs) 06:46, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Someone posted about Fleetwood Mac in Chicago in an earlier talk page section, above. That was seven years ago, so I'm starting a new discussion. This album is definitely a studio album, not a compilation album. I'm going to wait a little while to see if anyone else has an opinion about this, and then update the discography to reflect it. The infobox chronologies should also be adjusted accordingly, and so should the text of the articles, as mentioned in the previous post. — Mudwater ( Talk) 23:30, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
I know of four albums not listed on here, which I'd like to add, but I've got questions about each of them:
Albatross (credited to Fleetwood Mac and Christine Perfect): https://www.discogs.com/master/38646-Fleetwood-Mac-Christine-Perfect-Albatross It's a compilation but as it has dual credits, I guess this needs a new category?
Rhiannon and other tales: https://www.discogs.com/release/12683073-Fleetwood-Mac-Rhiannon-Other-Tales Never break the chain: https://www.discogs.com/release/12815323-Fleetwood-Mac-Never-Break-The-Chain These two are both live, but unofficial releases, can they still go in?
The Alternate Rumours: https://www.discogs.com/release/15923982-Fleetwood-Mac-The-Alternate-Rumours This is an RSD special edition, featuring alternative mixes of the classic Rumours album. Does that make it a studio album or a compilation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twistedwheelnut2 ( talk • contribs) 11:39, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Very-Best-Fleetwood-Mac/dp/B002N3GD44/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1271791552&sr=8-2 I know Amazon has the year right on this - I worked at a cd distribution company in late '09 and packed hundreds of these - how does it not have its own entry by now, let alone a listing on this ? ☭ мдснєтє тдлк ЅТЦФФ 19:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
This was a CD set containing three previously released albums: Fleetwood Mac, Tango in the Night and Mirage.
http://www.discogs.com/Fleetwood-Mac-Trilogy-Three-Classic-Albums/release/1827390
Not certain if it should properly go under Compilations or Studio Albums. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.170.145.22 ( talk) 15:29, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Fleetwood Mac in Chicago is listed as a "studio album" on this page, but this throws the numbering of the albums on their own respective pages into disarray. Kiln House states that it is the "fourth studio album", Future Games states that it is the "fifth studio album", and so on, when in actual fact the fourth album is "Fleetwood Mac in Chicago" if it is an actual studio album. One way or the other there is a mistake that needs to be corrected, but which mistake depends on what we are going to class the album as. Is it a studio album or isn't it? Burbridge92 ( talk) 18:53, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Now that this article has been protected, can the two editors who want to make changes please state what they want to do. No doubt some of it is fine, but you don't agree with each other on all of it. Bretonbanquet ( talk) 01:08, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi, well to start of with the number of singles in the infobox don't match the number in the singles section.
The Video section in the infobox state the number of videos is 0 even though there is a dvd section (Which should be titled videos not dvd releases as most were released on video years before dvd came out.) there should not be a section titled archival releases. How many other pages have them? so i took the releases from that section and listed them in the compilation or live album sections.
I think the Music videos and Video albums should be put in a section the same as Albums are (Studio, Live, Compilation.)
The 1968 Fleetwood Mac album has also known as Peter Green's Fleetwood Mac by it but the other Fleetwood Mac album (From 1975) doesn't say also known as The White Album, so i think both should just be simply listed as fleetwood mac, people can tell the albums apart easily without that by (1. the year or 2. clicking on the albums page.)
There should not be a list of tours on a discography page. this key is mentioned on top of the singles page Key to chart headings: UK (United Kingdom), U.S. (United States), U.S. Rock (United States Billboard Mainstream Rock Tracks), U.S. AC (United States Billboard Adult Contemporary Tracks), CAN (Canada), AUS (Australia), IRL (Ireland), GER (Germany), NL (Netherlands), FRA (France), NOR (Norway), AUT (Austria). it is not used on any other people can see what they are by clicking on the info at the top of the chart. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 01:24, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
My Opinion SORTED
TO BE DISCUSSED
Everything that has been discussed so far i am happy with but im still a bit unsure to what will happen to the Archival releases. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 01:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
I agree with most of what you said, i think the singles section instead of leaving the tables blank but N/A or something to indicate better. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 02:09, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
I am happy for the page to stay like it is for now if you are.
Do you mean you think we should keep them all listed together like they are now but just rename the section? Lukejordan02 ( talk) 02:31, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
So what now then,(I Don't no what country your in but it is currently 3:37 A.M in the UK.) Lukejordan02 ( talk) 02:38, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
The main purpose of my edit on this page was nothing but a simplification of too messy wikitable, because it makes the article unnecessarily large. I saved the article at a time (after trying a thousand times of previews), simply because making too much consecutive posts (like Lukejordan02 did) are not desirable for Wikipedia. I think there's no need to discuss about such kind of edits basically, because it's NOT a major changes at all. I have nothing to say about anything else, so I entrust any other contributions to other editors. Fugreena 04:36, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
I have took my previous edits and added in the things we have talked over, here is a preview. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 18:09, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
I have no problem with the incorrect videos being removed but I don't no what's what. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 23:08, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
If you want to edit the tables above to show how it should look when it's done then that's fine. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 23:09, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes, Dragonfly did chart on the physical single chart. Some record store was having a vinyl sale. Combined with the fact that we never got a US release for Dragonfly, the song hit #9. I don't think these minor charts are supposed to be included on this page. I may be wrong though; the Rock Mainstream chart is one of the charts included, so maybe other minor charts can too. As for Canada and New Zealand, I only have some information on peak positions. 25 Years hit #1 in New Zealand and Opus Collection hit the top 200. When I get the chance, I'll include Canada and New Zealand. "Go Your Own Way" and "Oh Well" are already included. Don't know about the certifications though.
I was also able to obtain chart information for Italy, so I'll be sure to add that sometime. Dobbyelf62 ( talk) 20:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
There's still the question of the other compilation albums which were removed and have to go back in. I can either put them in the table with the others, or have two groups – one in the table consisting of albums that charted, and a second list of albums that did not chart. I don't mind either way. Bretonbanquet ( talk) 18:33, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
I think it would be best to have them all listed under the one table (as the Rolling Stones & the Beatles pages have for example.) If you could add them that would be great as I don't no what's missing. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 20:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for the help the page looks really good, adding notes for repeated releases is a GREAT idea and should be the way forward on all discography pages (rather than add 4 or 5 of the same album under different names as it is really confusing.) Lukejordan02 ( talk) 22:14, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Fleetwood Mac discography's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "ARIA":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:19, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
I think the chart positions for this song are mixed up. I believe it peaked at 43 in the U.S., based on the As Long As you Follow page [1] not the U.K. BrianHagan ( talk) 01:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
References
How about listing UK and US certifications in singles instead of some 'lesser' countries chart positions - like you do in albums.
Albatross - 250,000 Silver (physical) Tusk - 250,000 Silver (physical)
Go Your Own Way - 400,000 Gold (download) The Chain - 200,000 Silver (download) Dreams - 200,000 Silver (download) Everywhere - 200,000 Silver (download)
and in the US Dreams - 1,000,000 Gold (physical) 1 million for gold back in 1970s The Chain - 500,000 Gold (download)
(
Coachtripfan (
talk)
17:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC))
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Fleetwood Mac discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:51, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
...reached #16 on this Canadian Adult Contemporary chart, but I couldn't get the table to co-operate to include the info. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/028020/f2/nlc008388.6027.pdf 2001:56A:F414:D300:8832:46C4:A535:A13D ( talk) 02:36, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
16th studio album, Time, seems to have dropped out of the discography. It's still in the category Fleetwood Mac albums, and at /info/en/?search=Time_(Fleetwood_Mac_album) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smcleish ( talk • contribs) 06:46, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Someone posted about Fleetwood Mac in Chicago in an earlier talk page section, above. That was seven years ago, so I'm starting a new discussion. This album is definitely a studio album, not a compilation album. I'm going to wait a little while to see if anyone else has an opinion about this, and then update the discography to reflect it. The infobox chronologies should also be adjusted accordingly, and so should the text of the articles, as mentioned in the previous post. — Mudwater ( Talk) 23:30, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
I know of four albums not listed on here, which I'd like to add, but I've got questions about each of them:
Albatross (credited to Fleetwood Mac and Christine Perfect): https://www.discogs.com/master/38646-Fleetwood-Mac-Christine-Perfect-Albatross It's a compilation but as it has dual credits, I guess this needs a new category?
Rhiannon and other tales: https://www.discogs.com/release/12683073-Fleetwood-Mac-Rhiannon-Other-Tales Never break the chain: https://www.discogs.com/release/12815323-Fleetwood-Mac-Never-Break-The-Chain These two are both live, but unofficial releases, can they still go in?
The Alternate Rumours: https://www.discogs.com/release/15923982-Fleetwood-Mac-The-Alternate-Rumours This is an RSD special edition, featuring alternative mixes of the classic Rumours album. Does that make it a studio album or a compilation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twistedwheelnut2 ( talk • contribs) 11:39, 27 January 2022 (UTC)